Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1933 > December 1933 Decisions > G.R. Nos. 38215 & 38216 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. FAUSTINO RIVERA

059 Phil 236:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. Nos. 38215 & 38216. December 22, 1933.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAUSTINO RIVERA, Defendant-Appellee.

Attorney-General Jaranilla for Appellant.

Gregorio A. Seña for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; INCRIMINATING AN INNOCENT PERSON; ARTICLE 363 REVISED PENAL CODE, AND ARTICLE 326, OLD PENAL CODE, COMPARED AND CONSTRUED. — Comparing article 363 of the Revised Penal Code with article 326 of the old Penal Code, it will be observed that under article 326 of the former Penal Code, the gravamen of the offense is the imputation itself when made before an administrative or judicial officer, whereas in article 363 of the Revised Penal Code the gravamen of the offense is performing an act which "tends directly" to such an imputation. Article 326 of the old Penal Code punishes false prosecutions whereas article 363 of the Revised Penal Code punishes any act which may tend directly to cause a false prosecution.

2. ID.; ID.; STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION. — It is well settled law that where the text of a statute is clear, it is improper to resort to a caption or title to make it obscure. Such secondary sources may be resorted to in order to remove, not to create doubt. (Cf. People v. Yabut, 58 Phil., 499.)

3. ID.; ID.; ID. — It seems the more reasonable and sensible interpretation to limit article 363 of the Revised Penal Code to acts of "planting" evidence and the like, which do not in themselves constitute false prosecutions but tend directly to cause false prosecutions. It is a well settled rule that statutes should receive a sensible construction, such as will give effect to the legislative intention and so as to avoid and unjust or an absurd conclusion . (Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S., 47, 59; 36 Law ed., 340, 344.)

4. ID.; ID.; ID. — If we extended said article by interpretation to administrative and judicial proceedings, it is apparent that we would open the door to a flood of prosecutions in cases where the defendants were acquitted. There is no reason to believe that the Legislature intended such a result.


D E C I S I O N


BUTTE, J.:


This is an appeal filed by the Attorney-General from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Tayabas sustaining demurrers to the two amended informations and dismissing the cases filed against the appellee Faustino Rivera. The amended information in G. R. No. 38215 is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"El Fiscal Provincial que suscribe, acusa a Faustino Rivera, del delito ’inculpacion de un inocente’, previsto y castigado en el articulo 363 del Codigo Penal Revisado, cometido como sigue:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Que en o hacia el dia 23 de junio de 1932, en el Municipio de Lucena, Provincia de Tayabas, Islas Filipinas, y dentro de la jurisdiccion de este Juzgado, el referido acusado Faustino Rivera voluntaria, ilegal y maliciosamente ejecuto un acto que directamente tendio a inculpar a Domingo Vito la comision de un delito de hurto siendo este inocente de dicho delito, consistiendo el acto ejecutado por el acusado en la presentacion de una denuncia por escrito y bajo juramento en el Juzgado de Paz de Lucena, Tayabas (causa criminal No. 6543), acusado, falsamente y sin causa probable alguna, a Domingo Vito de dicho delito, causa que fue sobreseida definitivamente por falta de pruebas. Con infraccion de la ley."cralaw virtua1aw library

The amended information in G.R. No. 38216 is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"El Fiscal Provincial que suscribe, acusa a Faustino Rivera, del delito de ’inculpacion de un inocente’, previsto y castigado en el articulo 363 del Codigo Penal Revisado, cometido como sigue:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Que en o hacia el dia 23 de junio de 1932, en el Municipio de Lucena, Provincia de Tayabas, Islas Filipinas, y dentro de la jurisdiccion de este Juzgado, el referido acusado Faustino Rivera voluntaria, ilegal y maliciosamente ejecuto un acto que directamente tendio a inculpar a Felisa Moreno la comision de un delito hurto siendo esta inocente de dicho delito, consistiendo el acto ejecutado por el acusado en la presentacion de una denuncia por escrito y bajo juramento en el Juzgado de Paz de Lucena, Tayabas (causa criminal No. 6543), acusando, falsamente y sin causa probable alguna, a Felisa Moreno de dicho delito, causa que fue sobreseida definitivamente por falta de pruebas. Con infraccion de la ley."cralaw virtua1aw library

To these informations the defendant interposed a single demurrer alleging that the facts averred in said informations do not constitute the crime defined and punished by article 363 of the Revised Penal Code. The court below heard the two cases together and sustained the demurrer. Upon the Government’s declining to amend the cases were dismissed and this appeal brought.

The appellant makes the following assignments of error:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. In not holding that the facts alleged in the informations filed in these two cases properly fall under article 363 of the Revised Penal Code; and

"2. In sustaining the demurrer interposed to said informations and in dismissing both of these cases."cralaw virtua1aw library

It appears from the record in criminal case No. 6543 of the justice of the peace of Lucena, Tayabas, that on June 23, 1932, the defendant-appellee Faustino Rivera signed and swore to a complaint (Exhibit A) before said justice of the peace which is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The undersigned accuses Domingo Vito and Felisa Moreno, of the crime of theft, committed as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about the 22 day of June, 1932, in the municipality of Lucena, Province of Tayabas, Philippine Islands, and within the jurisdiction of this court, the said accused, conspiring and confederating together, willfully, unlawfully and feloniously, without the use of force upon things, took and carried away, one white American suit, containing one eye glass, to the value of P30, and one buntal hat, valued at P3, two buttons at P3 each, total value, is P39, to the prejudice of the undersigned.

"Act committed is contrary to the statute in such cases made and provided:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Witnesses:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. NICANOR ZOLETA

"2. Sgt. RANAS, Q.

"(Fdo.) FAUSTINO RIVERA

"Subscribed and sworn to before me this 23d day of June, 1932, in Lucena, Tayabas.

"(Fdo.) FEDERICO M. UNSON

"Justice of the Peace"

On June 29, 1932, the justice of the peace entered the following decision (omitting the caption):jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Comparecen los acusados Domingo Vito y Felisa Moreno, ambos vec. de Lucena, Tayabas, acompañados de sus abogados. Estos hicieron constar no culpables. Oidas las pruebas de los testigos de cargo el Juzgado sobresee el asunto por falta de pruebas con costas de oficio.

"Lucena, junio 29, 1932.

"Asi se ordena.

"(Fdo.) FEDERICO M. UNSON

"Juez de Paz de Lucena"

After the justice of the peace rendered his decision on June 29, 1932, dismissing the complaint filed against Domingo Vito and Felisa Moreno, the latter filed separate complaints against Faustino Rivera before the same justice, charging Rivera with the offense of incriminating an innocent person (article 363 of the Revised Penal Code) by the act of filing the said information charging them with the crime of theft. The defendant raised the same question and objection which he repeated in the Court of First Instance on appeal, namely, that the facts alleged did not fall under the condemnation of article 363 of the Revises Penal Code.

There is no doubt that the facts alleged in the informations above-quoted fall within the definition of the offense of "acusacion" or "denuncia falsa" which is contained in article 326 of the Codigo Penal, which was superseded on January 1, 1932, by the Revised Penal Code.

This article is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"ART. 326. Se comete el delito de acusacion o denuncia falsa imputando falsamente a alguna persona hechos que, si fueren ciertos constituirian delito de los que dan lugar a procedimiento de oficio, si esta imputacion se hiciere ante funcionario administrativo o judicial que por razon de su cargo debiera proceder a su averiguacion o castigo.

"No se procedera, sin embargo, contra el denunciador o acusador sino en virtud de sentencia firme o auto, tambien firme, de sobreseimiento del tribunal que hubiere conocido del delito imputado.

"Este mandara proceder de oficio contra el denunciador o acusador, siempre que de la causa principal resultaren meritos bastantes para abrir el nuevo proceso."cralaw virtua1aw library

Article 326 of the Codigo Penal does not appear in the Revised Penal Code, which contains no offense denominated "acusacion o denuncia falsa" or its equivalent. But the Solicitor-General contends that article 363 of the Revised Penal Code should be construed to embrace the crime of false accusation or complaint as formerly penalized under article 326 of the Codigo Penal.

Article 363 in the Spanish text which is decisive is as follows, under the heading of "Asechanzas Inculpatorias" :chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

ART. 363. Inculpacion de un inocente. — El que, de cualquier manera que no constituyere falso testimonio, ejecutare un acto que tienda directamente a inculpar o imputar a un inocente la comision de un delito, sera castigado con la pena de arresto mayor."cralaw virtua1aw library

As article 363 of the Revised Penal Code is new and this is the first case before the court calling for its interpretation, a comparison of the article with article 326 of the former Penal Code seems expedient in view of the argument of the Government that the former "is a reproduction of both the crime of false accusation or complaint and the crime of calumny described under said article 326 and article 452 of the old Penal Code."cralaw virtua1aw library

In passing it may be stated that if article 363 of the Revised Penal Code could be construed to include article 452 of the old Penal Code it would have no application to the case that we are considering because article 452 of the old Penal Code which is as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

ART. 452. Calumny is the false imputation of a crime upon which a prosecution might be instituted by the government of its own motion."cralaw virtua1aw library

does not refer to false accusations or denuncias made before an administrative or judicial officer whose duty it is to investigate or punish such crime.

Comparing now article 363 of the Revised Penal Code with article 326 of the old Penal Code, it will be observed that under article 326 of the former Penal Code, the gravamen of the offense is the imputation itself when made before an administrative or judicial officer, whereas in article 363 of the Revised Penal Code the gravamen of the offense is performing an act which "tends directly" to such an imputation. Article 326 of the old Penal Code punishes false prosecutions whereas article 363 of the Revised Penal Code punishes any act which may tend directly to cause a false prosecution.

It is well settled law that where the text of a statute is clear, it is improper to resort to a caption or title to make it obscure. Such secondary sources may be resorted to in order to remove, not to create doubt. (Cf. People v. Yabut, 58 Phil., 499.) In the present case we think it proper to call attention to the title immediately preceding article 363 of the Revised Penal Code which is as follows: "Asechanzas Inculpatorias", as throwing some light on the classes of acts which tend directly to lead to false prosecutions. The word asechanza, as defined in standard dictionaries, means as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Intriga, lazo, red, zancadilla, tranquilla, amaño, engaño, artificio, trama, treta, especie de maquinacion urdida, de celada dispuesta contra alguno, bien sea para perderlo enteramente, bien para jugarle (sin hundirlo) alguna mala pasada. Engaño o artificio para hacer daño a otro. Usase, por lo comun, en el plural, asechanzas. Accion y efecto de asechar." It seems to us a forced extension of the term asechanza to bring a formal criminal complaint within the conception of intriga, engaño, artificio, etc. It seems the more reasonable and sensible interpretation to limit article 363 of the Revised Penal Code to acts of "planting" evidence and the like, which do not in themselves constitute false prosecutions but tend directly to cause false prosecutions.

It is a well settled rule that statutes should receive a sensible construction, such as will give effect to the legislative intention and so as to avoid an unjust or an absurd conclusion. (Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S., 47, 59; 36 Law. ed., 340, 344.)

It is to be noted that article 326 of the old Penal Code contains the provision that the accuser could be prosecuted only on the order of the court, when the court was convinced upon the trial of the principal cause that there was sufficient basis for a charge of false accusation. Article 363 of the Revised Penal Code contains no such safeguard. If we extended said article by interpretation to administrative and judicial proceedings, it is apparent that we would open the door to a flood of prosecutions in cases where the defendants were acquitted. There is no reason to believe that the Legislature intended such a result.

The judgment below is affirmed with costs de oficio.

Avanceña, C.J., Street, Malcolm, Villa-Real, Hull, and Imperial, JJ., concur.

Abad Santos, J., concurs in the result.

Separate Opinions


DIAZ, J., concurring in the result:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

I concur in the result. The acts committed by the defendant- appellee according to the version thereof given in the majority opinion do not constitute the crime of incrimination of an innocent person as defined and penalized in article 363 of the Revised Penal Code, but that of libel by means of writings as defined and penalized in article 355 in connection with article 353 of the said Code, or that of false testimony in one of its forms stated in article 183, depending upon the circumstances present during the commission thereof. In the first case, all the essential elements of the said crime are present, to wit: (1) malicious imputation of a crime, which is that of theft, (2) committed by means of writing, and (3) with publicity, inasmuch as the defendant-appellee necessarily gave publicity to such imputation, which was found to be untrue, when he delivered his written charges falsely accusing Felisa Moreno and Domingo Vito of the crime of theft, to the justice of the peace of Lucena, Tayabas. In the latter case, the only thing to be proven is whether or not the defendant acted knowingly therein. But under the terms of the informations filed in these cases, neither the crime of libel nor that of false testimony could be proven, nor could the accused be found guilty of the aforesaid crimes in view of the fact that the informations in question are not in accordance with the law. I am compelled to express this opinion in order to offset any belief to the effect that the defendant-appellee is not liable.

VICKERS, J., dissenting:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

I dissent.

The facts alleged in the informations in question constitute the crime of perjury as defined and punished in article 183 of the Revised Penal Code, because it is charged that the defendant falsely and maliciously accused the offended party in a verified complaint of the crime of theft. With respect to the nature of the offense contemplated by article 363, I cannot agree to restricting it as proposed in the majority opinion, because when the article refers to "any act not constituting perjury" it is clear that it is not limited to "planting evidence" or similar acts. The effect of the majority opinion is that a person may falsely and maliciously accuse another of a crime in a complaint under oath without incurring in any criminal responsibility. If he should publicly make the same statements orally or in writing he would be guilty of slander or libel, but because he made oath to his statements and filed them in court he is exempt from criminal responsibility, no matter how false and malicious his accusation may have been. I cannot believe that such was the intention of the Legislature. The suggestion is unwarranted that the victim of a crime will be deterred from denouncing the perpetrator for fear of being prosecuted himself in case the person accused of committing the crime should be acquitted. It must be alleged and proved that the original accusation was false and malicious.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1933 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 38989 December 1, 1933 - ALEJO BASCO v. MANUEL ERNESTO GONZALEZ

    059 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 39298 December 1, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. SANTIAGO RAMOS, ET AL.

    059 Phil 7

  • G.R. No. 38499 December 6, 1933 - FAUSTINA UDARBE, ET AL. v. MARCIANA JURADO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 11

  • G.R. No. 38572 December 6, 1933 - EUSEBIO RIVERO v. MARIANO RIVERO

    059 Phil 15

  • G.R. No. 37792 December 7, 1933 - QUINTIN DE BORJA v. FRANCISCO DE BORJA

    059 Phil 19

  • G.R. No. 38097 December 7, 1933 - ASIATIC PETROLEUM CO., LTD. v. ORLANES & BANAAG TRANS. CO.

    059 Phil 24

  • G.R. No. 38552 December 7, 1933 - ENRIQUE SOMES v. VICENTE SOMES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 28

  • G.R. No. 38398 December 8, 1933 - PHIL. TRUST CO., ET AL. v. L. P. MITCHELL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 30

  • G.R. No. 39864 December 8, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCELINO VALENCIA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 42

  • G.R. No. 40492 December 8, 1933 - TIMOTEO EVANGELISTA v. CFI OF BULACAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 45

  • G.R. No. 40494 December 8, 1933 - GREGORIO PASCUA, ET AL. v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 48

  • G.R. No. 37105 December 9, 1933 - GUI PING HUI v. ACTING INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 52

  • G.R. No. 38298 December 9, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. JESUS TOLENTINO

    059 Phil 56

  • G.R. No. 37467 December 11, 1933 - SAN CARLOS MILLING CO. v. BPI, ET AL.

    059 Phil 59

  • G.R. No. 38850 December 11, 1933 - ANTONIO ESTIVA, ET AL. v. GONZALO CAWIL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 67

  • G.R. No. 39034 December 11, 1933 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. GEORGE A. YARED

    059 Phil 72

  • G.R. No. 39456 December 11, 1933 - PASTOR V. VALERA v. RURAL TRANSIT CO.

    059 Phil 93

  • G.R. No. 39470 December 11, 1933 - NORTH LUZON TRANS. CO., INC., ET AL. v. PASTOR V. VALERA

    059 Phil 96

  • G.R. No. 39008 December 12, 1933 - NIEVES E. SAÑGA v. SEGUNDO ZABALLERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 101

  • G.R. No. 37185 December 13, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. CHUA BUAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 106

  • G.R. No. 38332 December 14, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. VALERIANO DUCOSIN

    059 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 38709 December 14, 1933 - SY TIANGCO v. HIPOLITO PABLO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 119

  • In the matter of the complaint against Attorney Gregorio O. Santos. December 16, 1933 - INES VENTURA v. GREGORIO O. SANTOS

    059 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. 38256 December 16, 1933 - PHIL. COOP. LIVESTOCK ASSO. v. TOMAS EARNSHAW, ET AL.

    059 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. 38417 December 16, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO MEDINA

    059 Phil 134

  • G.R. No. 39003 December 16, 1933 - LAUREANO ELEGADO, ET AL. v. NICANOR TAVORA

    059 Phil 140

  • G.R. No. 39403 December 16, 1933 - LEE SING v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 147

  • G.R. No. 38773 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GINES S. ALBURQUERQUE

    059 Phil 150

  • G.R. No. 39913 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO N. MELENDREZ

    059 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. 39181 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. 39217 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. 39275 December 20, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO MENDOZA

    059 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. 40637 December 20, 1933 - M.P. TRANS. CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    059 Phil 173

  • G.R. No. 40759 December 20, 1933 - LIME CORP. OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. MANUEL V. MORAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. 36890 December 21, 1933 - BPI v. PASCUAL ACUÑA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. 37590 December 21, 1933 - JOSE FERNANDO RODRIGO v. CONCEPCION CABIGAO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 187

  • G.R. No. 37640 December 21, 1933 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. EL AHORRO INSULAR

    059 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. 38010 December 21, 1933 - PATRICK HENRY FRANK, ET AL. v. G. KOSUYAMA

    059 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. 38084 December 21, 1933 - DOLORES M. VIUDA DE BARRETTO ET AL. v. LA PREVISORA FILIPINA

    059 Phil 212

  • G.R. No. 38131 December 21, 1933 - BEHN, MEYER & CO., ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    059 Phil 227

  • G.R. No. 38684 December 21, 1933 - CYRUS PADGETT v. BABCOCK & TEMPLETON, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 232

  • G.R. Nos. 38215 & 38216 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. FAUSTINO RIVERA

    059 Phil 236

  • G.R. No. 38375 December 22, 1933 - JOSE SY JONG CHUY v. PABLO C. REYES

    059 Phil 244

  • G.R. No. 39078 December 22, 1933 - NICASIA BATALLONES v. PUBLEO BATALLONES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. 39839 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 272

  • G.R. No. 40659 December 22, 1933 - PASAY TRANS. CO., INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    059 Phil 278

  • G.R. No. 40889 December 22, 1933 - ISIDORO YBOLEON v. PEDRO MA. SISON, ET AL.

    059 Phil 281

  • G.R. No. 35694 December 23, 1933 - ALLISON D. GIBBS v. GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS

    059 Phil 293

  • G.R. No. 37090 December 23, 1933 - CRISANTA SUAREZ, ET AL. v. PRUDENCIO TIRAMBULO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. 37345 December 23, 1933 - ALEJANDRA REPOLLO, ET AL. v. BERNABE BALECHA

    059 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 37452 December 23, 1933 - FERMIN SUPIA, ET AL. v. JOSE M. QUINTERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 312

  • G.R. No. 38052 December 23, 1933 - CONCEPCION ABELLA DE DIAZ v. ERLANGER & GALINGER, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 326

  • G.R. No. 38434 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO D. MEDINA

    059 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 38774 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. ALEKO LILIUS

    059 Phil 339

  • G.R. Nos. 39840 & 39841 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 343