Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1940 > November 1940 Decisions > G.R. No. 47423 November 14, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTINA ORPIANO

070 Phil 522:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 47423. November 14, 1940.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARTINA ORPIANO, Defendant-Appellant.

Isidoro B. Ibay for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Ozaeta and Assistant Attorney Ibañez for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE; PARRICIDE; SELF-DEFENSE. — The irritability and cruelty of the deceased, his insufferance and jealousy, are facts testified to by the accused and are not disproved. And a woman, though worn out and made unhappy by conjugal sufferings and cruelties but clinging fast to dear life, has every right to defend her own self in the face of a real menace, whether coming from a stranger or from an irate husband. This was the situation of M.


D E C I S I O N


LAUREL, J.:


In the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, Martina Orpiano was charged with the crime of parricide committed according to the information as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about the 20th day of February, 1938, in the municipality of Villasis, Province of Pangasinan, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this court, the abovenamed accused, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously kill her lawful husband Santiago Dulay. Contrary to law."cralaw virtua1aw library

After entering a plea of "not guilty," Martina Orpiano was tried and found guilty of the crime charged, and, due to the concurrence of three attenuating circumstances and no aggravating circumstances, was sentenced to an indeterminate prison sentence of six years and one day of prision mayor to twelve years and one day of reclusion temporal, to indemnify the heirs of the deceased in the sum of P2,000 and to pay the costs.

From this decision, the accused has appealed and assigns as error the failure of the lower court to entertain her plea of self-defense.

It appears that the accused, Martina Orpiano, and the deceased, Santiago Dulay, were married in 1927. Their married life was not happy because of the jealousy and cruelties of Santiago Dulay. For eight years Martina bore stoically her unfortunate marital lot, but finally, unable to withstand ill-treatment, she left the conjugal home to live in the municipality of Villasis, Pangasinan. A month after her departure her husband followed her and through the intervention of third persons then became reconciled and again lived together as husband and wife in Villasis. Notwithstanding their reconciliation, however, Santiago Dulay showed no atonement in the treatment of his wife. On the night of February 19, 1938, Santiago Dulay threatened to kill his wife. As she was then suffering from fever she went to bed, and when she woke up the next morning, she found her husband gone. She inquired as to his whereabouts and then decided to visit her father who was also sick and to ask him for some medicinal herbs for the cure of her fever. Upon her return, she again inquired as to the whereabouts of her husband. Her companions in the house told her that her husband had arrived but that he had again left in search for her. Because she was having headache she laid herself down to rest. Some time later, her husband arrived and he immediately scolded her and indignantly said: "Where have you been? I will kill you. What you said that you are sick is only a pretext as you pretend to be sickly." He thereupon ordered his children of his first marriage to go out and their own children to take the carabaos to pasture. The two left alone in the house, the deceased began to kick and otherwise maltreat her, and in his rage, got hold of his bolo. When Martina saw this, she ran away from the house to look for the barrio lieutenant. Bolo in hand, the husband pursued her. In the pursuit he stumbled over one of the tobacco trunks in the field and fell thereby releasing his hold on the bolo Martina ran back to pick up the bolo, but her husband swiftly stood up, held her by the arms and tried to wrest the bolo from her. In the struggle she inflicted the following wounds upon her husband: two transversal wounds, one 9 cm. Iong and 3 cm. deep, and the other 8 cm. long and 3 cm. deep, which cut the jugular vein and various parts of the left side of the neck and fractured two cervical vertebrae.

The foregoing facts are testified to by Martina and corroborated by Carlos Nicolas. It is true that these facts are contradicted by Generosa Dulay and Jorge Fabro, the barrio lieutenant. Generosa Dulay, however, is the daughter of the deceased Santiago Dulay by his first marriage, whose testimony was limited to the ownership of the bolo, Exhibit A. As to barrio lieutenant Fabro, he could only testify as to segregated portions of the incident. He testified only as to the regular and ordinary walking of the deceased without a bolo and to the part when the deceased and the accused were locked in struggle. The space of time between these two segregated portions of the incident, which was surely much filled with action, was not within his knowledge.

The irritability and cruelty of the deceased, his insufferance and jealousy, are facts testified to by the accused and are not disproved. And a woman, though worn out and made unhappy by conjugal sufferings and cruelties but clinging fast to dear life, has every right to defend her own self in the face of a real menace, whether coming from a stranger or from an irate husband. This was the situation of Martina.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed and the accused acquitted, with costs de oficio. So ordered.

Avanceña, C.J., Imperial, Diaz, and Horrilleno, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1940 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 47318 November 6, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. PEDRO LAGUTAN

    070 Phil 481

  • G.R. No. 47124 November 7, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. VITO CABIGUIN

    070 Phil 483

  • G.R. No. 46975 November 8, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. JOSE BANDOJO

    070 Phil 486

  • G.R. No. 47325 November 8, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. VICENTE LLANES Y RAMON TORLAO

    070 Phil 490

  • G.R. No. 47440 November 8, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. ANTONIO VELISARIO Y OTROS

    070 Phil 496

  • G.R. No. 47425 November 12, 1940 - PONCIANO JACINTO v. STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY

    070 Phil 501

  • G.R. No. 46948 November 13, 1940 - PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. LUISA AVECILLA VIUDA DE CELIS

    070 Phil 504

  • G.R. No. 46978 November 14, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. MARCOS ESTIPONA

    070 Phil 513

  • G.R. No. 47364 November 14, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. PASTOR LACSAMANA Y OTROS

    070 Phil 517

  • G.R. No. 47423 November 14, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTINA ORPIANO

    070 Phil 522

  • G.R. No. 46998 November 16, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. JUAN LAZADA

    070 Phil 525

  • G.R. No. 47176 November 16, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. TRINIDAD BRINGAS

    070 Phil 528

  • G.R. No. 47403 November 16, 1940 - BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION CO. v. BAGONG PAGKAKAISA

    070 Phil 533

  • G.R. No. 47458 November 16, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO OLOD

    070 Phil 537

  • G.R. No. 47486 November 16, 1940 - MANILA TRADING SUPPLY CO. v. PHIL. LABOR UNION

    070 Phil 539

  • G.R. No. 47083 November 18, 1940 - ALEJANDRO JAVIER v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    070 Phil 550

  • G.R. No. 47289 November 18, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ONG TA

    070 Phil 553

  • G.R. No. 47324 November 18, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE TOPACIO NUENO

    070 Phil 556

  • G.R. No. 46973 November 19, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SILVERIO MORADOS, ET AL.

    070 Phil 558

  • G.R. No. 47064 November 19, 1940 - BOHOL LAND TRANS. CO. v. BISAYA LAND TRANSPORTATION CO.

    070 Phil 562

  • G.R. No. 47190 November 19, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. DIONISIO FABRO

    070 Phil 567

  • G.R. No. 47288 November 19, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. LAMPACO AMEROL Y OTROS

    070 Phil 571

  • G.R. No. 46972 November 20, 1940 - CARLOS YOUNG v. EL REGISTRADOR DE TITULOS DE MANILA

    070 Phil 573

  • G.R. No. 47104 November 20, 1940 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO ASAS, ET AL.

    070 Phil 578

  • G.R. No. 46786 November 25, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. OCTAVIO MARASIGAN

    070 Phil 583

  • G.R. No. 46890 November 25, 1940 - GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER EXPORT CO. v. ZAMBALES CHROMITE MINING CO.

    070 Phil 595

  • G.R. No. 46906 November 25, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. PETRONIO ALAGAO

    070 Phil 599

  • G.R. No. 47178 November 25, 1940 - INTERNATIONAL HARDWOOD & VENEER CO. v. PANGIL FEDERATION OF LABOR

    070 Phil 602

  • G.R. No. 47180 November 25, 1940 - ISIDRO ALEJANDRO v. EL JUZGADO DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA DE BULACAN

    070 Phil 613

  • G.R. No. 47205 November 26, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. MARIANO IROG

    070 Phil 615

  • G.R. No. 47279 November 26, 1940 - MANILA ELECTRIC CO. v. NAT’L. LABOR UNION

    070 Phil 617

  • G.R. No. 47303 November 25, 1940 - REX TAXICAB CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

    070 Phil 621

  • G.R. No. 47316 November 25, 1940 - CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE TARLAC v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

    070 Phil 632

  • G.R. No. 47322 November 25, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. VIC TORINO CRISOSTOMO

    070 Phil 641

  • G.R. No. 47363 November 25, 1940 - ROMUALDA FRANCO v. GERVASIO DIAZ

    070 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. 47391 November 25, 1940 - JAO GUAN SOY Y JAO NE SUY v. JOSE DELGADO

    070 Phil 644

  • G.R. No. 47400 November 25, 1940 - RICARDO YAPJOCO v. COMMONWEALTH DE FILIPINAS

    070 Phil 646

  • G.R. No. 47565 November 25, 1940 - PHIL. MANUFACTURING CO. v. JESUS NABOR

    070 Phil 650

  • Asto. Adm. No. 756 November 26, 1940 - BIENVENIDO ECIJA v. RAMON T. ROMERO

    070 Phil 655

  • G.R. No. 47359 November 27, 1940 - DAVID BUSTOS v. JOSE MA. PAREDES

    070 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. 46953 November 28, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. FERMIN GONZALEZ

    070 Phil 667

  • G.R. No. 47161 November 28, 1940 - TAN KIAT HUN Y YAP KONG HA v. JOSE DELGADO

    070 Phil 669

  • G.R. No. 47339 November 28, 1940 - BARDWILL BROS. v. PHIL. LABOR UNION Y EL TRIBUNAL DE RELACIONES INDUSTRIALES

    070 Phil 672

  • G.R. No. 47350 November 28, 1940 - MARIANO M. LAZATIN v. NARCISO PEÑA

    070 Phil 680

  • G.R. No. 47360 November 28, 1940 - BOHOL LAND TRANSPORTATION CO. v. FERMINA VIUDA DE MADANGUIT Y OTROS

    070 Phil 685

  • Adm. Case No. 945 November 29, 1940 - CORNELIA IBAÑEZ v. TOMAS MORALES

    070 Phil 693

  • G.R. No. 47277 November 29, 1940 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. TELESFORO ESTRAÑERO

    070 Phil 696

  • G.R. No. 47410 November 29, 1940 - ORIENTAL GLASS PALACE v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    070 Phil 700

  • G.R. No. 47903 November 29, 1940 - JUAN SUMULONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    070 Phil 703