Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > December 1960 Decisions > G.R. Nos. L-12860-61 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGMEDIO SANTIAGO

110 Phil 385:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. Nos. L-12860-61. December 29, 1960.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff and appellee, v. IGMEDIO SANTIAGO, EPITACIO SANTIAGO, FLAVIANO SANTIAGO, DIOSDADO SANTIAGO, ELIAS SALMORIN, ADOLFO SALMORIN and SALUSTIANO SANTIAGO, defendants and appellants.

Nicanor D. Soroñgon for Appellants.

Solicitor Meliton G. Soliman and Solicitor Antonio M. Consing for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. THE CRIMINAL LAW; MURDER; FRUSTRATED MURDER; CONSPIRACY. — The fact that the seven appellants were seen gathered together before the commission of the crimes charged, and one of them was heard to have remarked that soon there would be a wake for the dead, strongly evinces conspiracy among them, specially when these same appellants, moments later, in unison executed acts of violence.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; TREACHERY; SUPERIOR STRENGTH ABSORBED BY TREACHERY. — While abuse of superior strength was also shown to have attended the commission of the crimes charged, the same cannot be considered a separate and distinct aggravating circumstances, because it is deemed absorbed by the circumstance of treachery.


D E C I S I O N


PAREDES, J.:


Prosecuted for murder and frustrated murder, the appellants were sentenced for homicide and serious physical injuries, as follows: In the case of homicide, taking into account the aggravating circumstance of superior strength and the mitigation circumstance of voluntary surrender, each to suffer an indeterminate penalty from 6 years and 1 day of prisión mayor 14 years, 8 months and 1 day of reclusión temporal, with the accessories of the law and to indemnify jointly and severally, the heirs of deceased Blas Bernal in the amount of P6,000.00 and to pay the costs; and in the serious physical injuries case, considering the same modifying circumstances, each to suffer an indeterminate penalty from 4 months of arresto mayor to 1 year and 1 day of prisión correccional and to pay the costs. The weapons Exhibits D to M were confiscated. They appealed to the Court of Appeals. The latter certified the cases to this tribunal, stating that the crimes committed are murder and frustrated murder and that the penalties imposable thereon are beyond its power to apply.

Accused Igmedio, Epitacio, Flaviano and Diosdado, all surnamed Santiago, are brothers, sons of one Anacleta Panaguiton by her second marriage, and Elias Salmorin, Adolfo Salmorin and Salustiano Santiago, are close relatives of the Santiago brothers. The deceased Blas Bernal in G.R. No. L-12860 and Ciriaco Bernal, offended party in G.R. L- 12861, are brothers, also sons of Anacleta Panaguiton by her first marriage. Tomas Santiago, now deceased, second husband of Anacleta Panaguiton, had been previously married to one Margarita Bernal, an aunt of the Bernal brothers. She died intestate leaving some real properties acquired during her marriage with the father of the Santiagos, but without any issue. The Bernals, believing that they had a right to inherit from their aunt Margarita Bernal, commenced Special Proceedings No. 1014 in the court of first instance of Iloilo, and had their elder brother Teodorico Bernal appointed as co-administrator, together with their mother Anacleta Panaguiton. The Santiagos, believing that they were the sole heirs of their deceased father Tomas Santiago, sought the revocation of Teodorico’s appointment. Bad blood then existed between the two sets of brothers and their enmity flared up into violence sometime in October, 1953, when Ciriaco Bernal was waylaid by the Santiagos by reason of Bernal’s gathering coconuts from the properties under administration.

The prosecution has established that the Santiagos and the Bernals were living in their respective houses in the barrio of Tarong, municipality of Carles, provinces of Iloilo. On July 3, 1954, Blas Bernal, Ciriaco Bernal and their nephew Gerardo Bernal were engaged, with several others, by Victoriano Paglinawan to plant rice in the latter’s field in their barrio of Tarong. they began planting early in the morning, and at about ten o’clock they were told by Victoriano Paglinawan to cease working and have breakfast. Thereafter, the Bernal brothers went to the house of Severo Salvidico to have a haircut, while their nephew Gerardo went to see his carabao pasturing in the field. In so doing, Gerardo passed near the house of Epitacio Santiago and saw the seven appellants squatted and huddled in front of the house. When Gerardo was within a hearing distance from the group, he heard Igmedio Santiago say, "very soon there will be a ‘velacion’ (wake for the dead)." Sensing that the remark was meant for the Bernals, Gerardo tried to look for his uncles to warn them. Meantimes, when the Bernals arrived at the house of Severo Salvidico for the haircut, they found that the barber was not in, so they retraced their steps towards the field of Victoriano. Ciriaco was then unarmed and Blas had a scythe girded on his waist, which he usually used in cutting coconut buds to extract "tuba." On their way, however, the seven appellants suddenly appeared, running towards them and brandishing their heels, but were overtaken at a place where there were bamboo clumps and bushes, and there simultaneously attacked by appellants from different directions, Epitacio delivering the first blow on Blas Bernal’s left face with a bolo, followed by an arrow shot by Diosdado, Ciriaco, on his part, was hit by Ignacio on the left arm and by Flaviano on the right ear which downed him. Ciriaco played possum, feigning death; whereupon appellants concentrated their attack on the wounded Blas, who died on the spot. At this juncture, Ciriaco seeing an opportunity for escape, sprinted towards the field where he timely met Victoriano Paglinawan about 30 yards away, and leaned on him. This deterred appellants from further pursuing him. Victoriano then took Ciriaco to town for medical attendance and to report to the police authorities.

Dr. Telesforo de los Reyes, the town medical officer, accompanied by the Mayor, a police sergeant and a sanitary inspector, on the same day, repaired to the spot where Blas died and found the body lying on one side, with an arrow stuck on the back which he pulled with difficulty. He found nine serious wounds on the body, two of which were mortal (Exhibit A). He likewise certified to the nine different injuries sustained by Ciriaco, which took some 40 to 50 days to heal (Exhibit C).

Appellants, on the other hand, presented an entirely different picture of the incident. Their version, as related by Flaviano and Diosdado, is an follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

That morning, while Flaviano was resting in his house together with Igmedio and Elias after planting rice in his own field, Salustiano came warning them that the Bernal brothers were coming, both heavily armed. After pulling a mat to cover the door, Flaviano peeped and saw that Blas really had a bolo in his left hand, another longer one in his right, and a scythe on his waist; while Ciriaco had a fighting bolo on his waist, a "palma brava" club in his left hand, and a spear on his shoulder. Ciriaco then shouted at Flaviano to come down and fight, but as Flaviano and his companions inside the house did not make any move, the Bernals then slashed the mat and entered the house; whereupon Elias, Salustiano, Flaviano and Igmedio jumped out and scampered away, Flaviano following Elias and Salustiano, while Igmedio took a different direction. Flaviano, thinking that he might be overtaken without any body helping him, changed his mind and ran, with the Bernals close to his heels, to the direction of the house of Epitacio which was about 400 brazas away. He saw his other brother Diosdado planting rice some 50 meters away, so he shouted at him for help, who in turn got a piece of wood and ran to the rescue of Flaviano. While the four were thus running, Blas threw his short bolo at Flaviano, hitting the latter on the back. Whereupon Flaviano picked it up and faced Blas. Blas then started to hack him with the longer bolo, but he parried the blow, causing Blas to drop it. Then Blas drew his scythe and again tried to slash him, but Flaviano parried it again, and Blas became weak. At this instance, Blas called out his brother Ciriaco, who was then fighting with Diosdado, for help. So Flaviano shoved Blas who fell on his back. Ciriaco then detached from his fight with Diosdado and went to succor Blas. Diosdado, in turn, followed Ciriaco and at the same time alerting his brother Flaviano, saying, "Nene, be careful, Ciriaco is going to you." Ciriaco then struck Flaviano which the latter parried, and then Flaviano countered with his bolo. At this time, Diosdado clubbed Ciriaco hitting the latter on the left arm and right ear. After receiving these blows, Ciriaco said, "I am giving up; I don’t want to fight anymore."cralaw virtua1aw library

Appellants presented Clementina Bernal, full-blood sister of the Bernals. She said that when she saw her brothers Blas and Ciriaco chasing Flaviano, she followed them so as to dissuade her brothers from fighting and she even saw Flaviano from afar wresting the scythe from Blas, but that when she overtook them, Blas was already bathed in his own blood, kneeling, and about to die. Anacleto Panaguiton stated that when she refused to give the Bernals their claim in the inheritance, Blas had intimidated to her that they might obtain their share "through the flow of blood." Dr. De los Reyes testified that he found two contused and three lacerated wounds on Flaviano that could have healed from 6 to 8 days (Exh. 13): and one contused and two lacerated wounds on Diosdado that could have healed from 5 to 7 days (Exh. 14). The doctor admitted, however, that these contused and lacerated wounds found on both brothers were merely the result of physical struggle, such as wrestling and not caused by any weapon.

The case hinges on the question of credibility. We have examined the record with meticulous care, and have come to the conclusion that the version of the defense, does not deserve any credence.

The four medical certificate on record are self revealing. Whereas the Bernals received wounds inflicted by sharp instruments like bolo, as asserted by Dr. De los Reyes, the Santiagos, on the other hand, merely showed contusions and lacerations which, according to the same doctor, were simply the result of wrestling or caused by fist, and not by any weapon, blunt or otherwise. This being the case, the said medical certificates confirm the version of the prosecution that the Bernals only fought with their bare hands, as against the onslaught of appellants who were all armed with different weapons. Were the Bernals really armed, as claimed by the Santiagos, at least Flaviano or Diosdado, or any of the appellants, for that matter, would have received some scratches caused by either bolo, scythe, spear or "palma brava" club with which the Bernals were allegedly armed. It is claimed by the defense that Flaviano was the only one who fought with the deceased Blas, while Ciriaco and Diosdado were fighting and that Flaviano merely parried one bolo blow and one scythe slash from Blas, an then shoved the latter in order to face Ciriaco who was coming to aid the deceased. If this were true, then said deceased could not have received nine wounds, considering that Flaviano did not hit the deceased even once and that Diosdado was only armed with a piece of wood which he picked at random in the field, moments before. This once more confirms the version of the prosecution that the other appellants participated directly in the killing of the deceased and near-killing of Ciriaco. Moreover, Ciriaco’s testimony dovetails with that of Victoriano Paglinawan. The latter told that court that the met Ciriaco, wounded and weak, running to him saying that he and his brother were intercepted by seven armed men. Paglinawan, only neutral witness in this case, for not being related to either the Bernals or the Santiagos, asserted that when the seven appellants, who were some 30 brazas away, saw that Ciriaco was already leaning on him, they desisted from their pursuit. The defense was not able to offer any explanation regarding the arrow which was found embedded on the back of the deceased. On the other hand, prosecution witness Gerardo Bernal positively declared that such arrow was shot by Diosdado. Again, when Flaviano, Diosdado, Epitacio, Igmedio and Salustiano (Saling) Santiago, surrendered to police Sgt. Crisanto Carmen, they told him they fought with the Bernal brothers.

The testimony of Anacleta Panaguiton, that it was the Bernals who had a grudge against the Santiagos on account of inheritance, does not help the cause of the appellants, as it is undisputed that there had been a mutual pent-up hatred against each other which erupted in open violence when Ciriaco was waylaid by the Santiagos, eight months prior to the slaying of Blas Bernal. The story of Clementina Bernal who sided with the Santiagos, against her full-blood Bernal brothers, is hard to believe, considering that her testimony is in direct contrast with her written statement (Exhibit O) made before the chief of police on July 7, 1954, when the incident was still fresh in her mind. In said written statement she said that while she was planting rice in the field, she heard shouts coming from behind the bamboo clumps about 300 meters away; that when she approached the place and was at a distance of ten meters, she saw her deceased brother Blas already bathed in blood, kneeling, with several wounds on his body and an arrow sticking on his back; that she saw Igmedio, Epitacio, Flaviano and Diosdado, walking fast heading to town, and likewise saw Adolfo Salmorin, Elias Salmorin and Salustiano Santiago equally walking fast toward their houses; and that while she was returning home, she also saw her brother Ciriaco, aided by Victoriano, walking in another road towards the town. Although she attempted to repudiate this statement, by alleging that the mayor did not faithfully translate its contents in the Visayan dialect, we have no ground for believing that said mayor would capriciously and deliberately distort the translation.

The simple denial made by the other appellants regarding their participation in the crime at bar can not overcome the direct, positive and straightforward testimony of the surviving victim Ciriaco Bernal and eyewitness Gerardo Bernal, who narrated convincingly the bloody manner with which the weaponless Bernals were surrounded and attacked by the armed appellants.

The fact that the seven appellants were seen gathered together in front of the house of Epitacio Santiago and one of them was heard to have remarked that soon there would be a wake for the dead, strongly evinces conspiracy among them, specially when these same appellants, moments later, in unison executed acts of violence.

With the exception of Elias Salmorin and Adolfo Salmorin, all the appellants surnamed Santiago, voluntarily surrendered to the police authorities right after the crime was committed. The slaying of Blas Bernal was attended by the qualifying circumstance of treachery (alevosia). Abuse of superior strength, was also shown but it is absorbed by the circumstance of treachery.

The five appellants surnamed Santiago, in the murder case, are, therefore, sentenced to suffer each an indeterminate penalty ranging from 6 years, 8 months and 1 day of prisión mayor to 14 years and 8 months of reclusión temporal; and appellants Adolfo Salmorin and Elias Salmorin, to suffer each reclusión perpetua.

In the frustrated murder case, committed on the person of Ciriaco Bernal, the Santiagos are hereby sentenced to suffer each an indeterminate penalty ranging from 2 years, and 4 months of prisión correccional to 7 years, and 4 months of prision mayor; and the Salmorins, to suffer each an indeterminate sentence ranging from 6 years, 8 months and 1 day of prisión mayor to 12 years, 10 months and 21 days of reclusión temporal.

With the modification above indicated, the decision appealed from hereby in affirmed in all other respects.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Labrador, Concepción , Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Gutiérrez David and Dizon, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-14762 December 20, 1960 - UNION DE EMPLEADOS DE TRENES v. KAPISANAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA MRR, CO.

    110 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. L-13007 December 23, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LOPE CUNANAN

    110 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. L-16283 December 27, 1960 - NEW ANGAT-MANILA TRANSPORTATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    110 Phil 318

  • G.R. No. L-10121 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO BERGANIO

    110 Phil 322

  • G.R. No. L-10405 December 29, 1960 - WENCESLAO PASCUAL v. SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS

    110 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. L-11037 December 29, 1960 - EDGARDO CARIAGA v. LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY.

    110 Phil 346

  • G.R. No. L-11179 December 29, 1960 - BURGOS T. SAYOC v. ELLEN CHEN

    110 Phil 356

  • G.R. No. L-11665 December 29, 1960 - ENRIQUE MORALES v. CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF CAVITE

    110 Phil 364

  • G.R. No. L-12087 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DEMETRIO CAIMBRE

    110 Phil 370

  • G.R. No. L-12450 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANASTACIO BOLIVAR

    110 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. L-12819 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISIDRO GUARNES

    110 Phil 379

  • G.R. Nos. L-12860-61 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGMEDIO SANTIAGO

    110 Phil 385

  • G.R. No. L-13018 December 29, 1960 - ADELA ROSARIO v. MARIA S. F. ROSARIO

    110 Phil 394

  • G.R. No. L-13075 December 29, 1960 - CO CHIN LENG v. EUGENIO MINTU

    110 Phil 396

  • G.R. No. L-13083 December 29, 1960 - MANUEL R. OLAÑO v. MANUEL BERNARDO

    110 Phil 398

  • G.R. No. L-13292 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WENCESLAO PAGULAYAN

    110 Phil 402

  • G.R. No. L-13308 December 29, 1960 - MANUEL PANGAN v. EVENING NEWS PUBLISHING CO.

    110 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. L-13401 December 29, 1960 - PRUDENTIAL BANK & TRUST CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    110 Phil 413

  • G.R. No. L-13695 December 29, 1960 - RCA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO.

    110 Phil 420

  • G.R. No. L-13746 December 29, 1960 - ISIDRO BOFIL v. CATALINO P. CASIDSID

    110 Phil 426

  • G.R. No. L-14219 December 29, 1960 - MARIANO G. SISON v. FELICIANO MAZA

    110 Phil 433

  • G.R. No. L-14245 December 29, 1960 - SOLEDAD ABIJUELA v. HOSPICIA DOLOSA

    110 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-14377 December 29, 1960 - EAST PACIFIC MERCHANDISING CORP. v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS

    110 Phil 443

  • G.R. No. L-14623 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. YAKANS ASPALIN

    110 Phil 454

  • G.R. No. L-14858 December 29, 1960 - MARIANO S. GONZAGA v. AUGUSTO CE DAVID

    110 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. L-14985 December 29, 1960 - FRANCISCO U. BUENASEDA v. BOWEN & CO., INC.

    110 Phil 464

  • G.R. No. L-15100 December 29, 1960 - IN RE: VICENTE TIU NAVARRO v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

    110 Phil 468

  • G.R. No. L-15118 December 29, 1960 - ERLANGER & GALINGER, INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    110 Phil 470

  • G.R. No. L-15140 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN DEROSARIO

    110 Phil 476

  • G.R. No. L-15154 December 29, 1960 - GIL VILLANUEVA v. FILOMENO GIRGED

    110 Phil 478

  • G.R. No. L-15155 December 29, 1960 - BOARD OF LIQUIDATORS v. EXEQUIEL FLORO

    110 Phil 482

  • G.R. Nos. L-15167-68 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSALIO PANCHO

    110 Phil 490

  • G.R. No. L-15182 December 29, 1960 - SANTIAGA BLANCO v. FRUCTUOSA ESQUIERDO

    110 Phil 494

  • G.R. No. L-15193 December 29, 1960 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ

    110 Phil 499

  • G.R. No. L-15595 December 29, 1960 - MARTIN CAÑADA v. CANDIDO RUBI

    110 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. L-15654 December 29, 1960 - DELGADO BROTHERS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    110 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. L-15753 December 29, 1960 - JUANA REYES VDA. DE AREJOLA v. CAMARINES SUR REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL SCHOOL

    110 Phil 517

  • G.R. No. L-15800 December 29, 1960 - C. K. VASWANI v. P. TARACHAND BROS.

    110 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. L-15813 December 29, 1960 - GERMAN DE ORTUBE v. JUSTINIANO T. ASUNCION

    110 Phil 529

  • G.R. No. L-15978 December 29, 1960 - DAVAO GULF LUMBER CORP. v. N. BAENS DEL ROSARIO

    110 Phil 532

  • G.R. No. L-16153 December 29, 1960 - ESTRELLA E. SERRANO v. ANDRES REYES

    110 Phil 536

  • G.R. No. L-16285 December 29, 1960 - JOSE SETON v. JOSE S. RODRIGUEZ

    110 Phil 548

  • G.R. No. L-17512 December 29, 1960 - CLARO IBASCO v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO

    110 Phil 553

  • G.R. Nos. L-13012 & L-14876 December 31, 1960 - CITY OF CEBU v. EDMUNDO S. PICCIO

    110 Phil 558

  • G.R. Nos. L-13983-85 December 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PERLITO SOYANG

    110 Phil 565

  • G.R. No. L-14921 December 31, 1960 - DOLORES B. GUICO v. PABLO G. BAUTISTA

    110 Phil 584

  • G.R. Nos. L-15024-25 December 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE SACAYANAN

    110 Phil 588

  • G.R. No. L-15560 December 31, 1960 - INTERNATIONAL OIL FACTORY WORKERS UNION v. ARSENIO MARTINEZ

    110 Phil 595

  • G.R. No. L-16035 December 31, 1960 - THERESE VILLANUEVA v. PANTALEON A. PELAYO

    110 Phil 602

  • G.R. No. L-16521 December 31, 1960 - PORFIRIO DIAZ v. EMIGDIO NIETES

    110 Phil 606