Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > December 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-15154 December 29, 1960 - GIL VILLANUEVA v. FILOMENO GIRGED

110 Phil 478:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-15154. December 29, 1960.]

GIL VILLANUEVA, plaintiff and appellant, v. FILOMENO GIRGED and LUCIO S. LEGASPI, defendants and appellees.

Montilla, Sanchez, Galicia & Alvizo for Appellant.

F. Q. Almazan and T. del Rosalio for appellee Legaspi.

Tranquilino O. Calo, Jr. for appellee Girged.


SYLLABUS


PLEADING AND PRACTICE; COMPLAINT; CAUSE OF ACTION, FAILURE TO ALLEGE SUFFICIENT. — As contended by defendant "L" and correctly sustained by the lower court, "L" did not, under the letter Annex "B", assume the obligation of his co defendant "G." He merely assured plaintiff that any amount due him by "G" would be taken care of in his third shipment of logs to Japan" and that "L" would "be the one to take care" of "G’s" account with plaintiff, "as soon as Mr. "G" has made this third shipment." Moreover, there is no allegation in the complaint to the effect that this shipment has been made, so that, even if said letter Annex "B" entailed an assumption of obligation, the condition imposed therefor had not been fulfilled as yet, and, hence, said obligation is not due, insofar as "L" is concerned.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


Appeal by plaintiff Gil Villanueva from an order of the Court of First Instance of Agusan, dismissing the complaint, insofar as defendant Lucio S. Legaspi is concerned, for lack of cause of action, with costs against plaintiff.

The complaint purports to set up three (3) causes of action, for the recovery of the sums of P7,350.00, P2,500.00 and P6,000.00, respectively.

It is alleged therein that the first sum represents the amount of a Philippine National Bank check, issued by defendant Girged in favor of the plaintiff, on February 27, 1956, in exchange for the same amount, in cash, delivered by the latter to the former; that upon presentation, the check was dishonored by the bank, for "Girged had no deposits therein" ; that in a letter dated April 28, 1956, copy of which is attached to the complaint as Annex B, defendant Lucio S. Legaspi had "expressly acknowledged and assumed the obligations" of Girged, who was his "business partner" ; and that, despite repeated demands, said sum of P7,350.00 is still unpaid.

By way of second cause of action, plaintiff alleged in the complaint that in February and April, 1956, defendants had hired his services as stevedore for the loading of round logs for exportation to Japan, with a total volume of 2,500 cubic meters, at the rate of P1.00 per cubic meter, making a total of P2,500.00; that the obligation to pay the same was, also, acknowledged and assumed by Legaspi in said letter Annex B; and that said obligation has not been paid despite repeated demands.

By way of third cause of action, plaintiff claims P2,500.00 for moral damages and P3,500.00 for attorney’s fees. The complaint contains, also, some allegations in support of the prayer therein that a writ of preliminary injunction be issued.

In due course, defendant Legaspi filed an answer, denying most of the allegations of the complaint, except the execution of the letter Annex B, and alleged, as "affirmative and special defenses", that plaintiff has no cause of action against him; that he is merely Girged’s attorney-in-fact; and that, in said letter, Annex B, he (Legaspi) merely tried to help plaintiff in the collection of his credit against Girged, upon completion of a given shipment of logs to Japan by Girged, which shipment has not been completed.

The lower court dealt with this special defense as if it were a motion to dismiss and, after due hearing, concluded that it was well taken. Hence, the order of dismissal appealed from.

The only question before us is whether or not the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to state a cause of action against Legaspi. This issue hinges on the nature and effect of the aforementioned letter Annex B, from which we quote:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"I wish to assure you that any amount that Mr. Girged owes you will be taken care of in his 3rd shipment of logs to Japan.

The 2nd shipment was a losing" proposition on account of the fact that it was an attached shipment of Poblete and Nasipit Lumber.

So please feel assure that I, myself, will be the one to take care of his account you as soon as Mr. Girged has made his 3rd shipment.

I wish to know also by return mail how much really Mr. Girged is indebted to you so that I may have full amount of Mr. Girged’s obligation.

I thank you.

Very truly yours,

PHILIPPINE EXPERIMENTERS’ SUPPLY CO.

(Sgd.) LUCIO S. LEGASPI"

As contented by Legaspi and sustained by the lower court, Legaspi did not thereby assume the obligation of Girged. Legaspi merely assured the plaintiff that any amount due to him by Girged would "be taken care of in his third shipment of logs to Japan" and that he (Legaspi) would "be the one to take care" of Girged’s account with plaintiff, "as soon as Mr. Girged has made his third shipment." Moreover, there is no allegation in the complaint to the effect that this shipment has been made, so that, even if said letter Annex B entailed an assumption of obligation, the condition imposed therefor had not been fulfilled as yet, and, hence, said obligation is not due, insofar as Legaspi is concerned. Although plaintiff claims that Girged and Legaspi are business partners — which is denied by both — there is no allegation in the complaint to the effect that the first two (2) causes of action have arisen from transactions with the partnership. Indeed, the contrary is inferable from the fact that plaintiff’s causes of action against Legaspi are based upon the alleged assumption of obligation in consequence of Legaspi’s letter Annex B, thus indicating that Legaspi was not deemed bound prior to said alleged assumption and that his obligation, if any, did not spring, therefore, from his status as alleged partner of Girged.

Wherefore, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed, with the costs of this instance against plaintiff Gil Villanueva. It is so ordered.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Gutierrez David, Paredes and Dizon, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-14762 December 20, 1960 - UNION DE EMPLEADOS DE TRENES v. KAPISANAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA MRR, CO.

    110 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. L-13007 December 23, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LOPE CUNANAN

    110 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. L-16283 December 27, 1960 - NEW ANGAT-MANILA TRANSPORTATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    110 Phil 318

  • G.R. No. L-10121 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO BERGANIO

    110 Phil 322

  • G.R. No. L-10405 December 29, 1960 - WENCESLAO PASCUAL v. SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS

    110 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. L-11037 December 29, 1960 - EDGARDO CARIAGA v. LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY.

    110 Phil 346

  • G.R. No. L-11179 December 29, 1960 - BURGOS T. SAYOC v. ELLEN CHEN

    110 Phil 356

  • G.R. No. L-11665 December 29, 1960 - ENRIQUE MORALES v. CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF CAVITE

    110 Phil 364

  • G.R. No. L-12087 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DEMETRIO CAIMBRE

    110 Phil 370

  • G.R. No. L-12450 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANASTACIO BOLIVAR

    110 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. L-12819 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISIDRO GUARNES

    110 Phil 379

  • G.R. Nos. L-12860-61 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGMEDIO SANTIAGO

    110 Phil 385

  • G.R. No. L-13018 December 29, 1960 - ADELA ROSARIO v. MARIA S. F. ROSARIO

    110 Phil 394

  • G.R. No. L-13075 December 29, 1960 - CO CHIN LENG v. EUGENIO MINTU

    110 Phil 396

  • G.R. No. L-13083 December 29, 1960 - MANUEL R. OLAÑO v. MANUEL BERNARDO

    110 Phil 398

  • G.R. No. L-13292 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WENCESLAO PAGULAYAN

    110 Phil 402

  • G.R. No. L-13308 December 29, 1960 - MANUEL PANGAN v. EVENING NEWS PUBLISHING CO.

    110 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. L-13401 December 29, 1960 - PRUDENTIAL BANK & TRUST CO. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    110 Phil 413

  • G.R. No. L-13695 December 29, 1960 - RCA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO.

    110 Phil 420

  • G.R. No. L-13746 December 29, 1960 - ISIDRO BOFIL v. CATALINO P. CASIDSID

    110 Phil 426

  • G.R. No. L-14219 December 29, 1960 - MARIANO G. SISON v. FELICIANO MAZA

    110 Phil 433

  • G.R. No. L-14245 December 29, 1960 - SOLEDAD ABIJUELA v. HOSPICIA DOLOSA

    110 Phil 436

  • G.R. No. L-14377 December 29, 1960 - EAST PACIFIC MERCHANDISING CORP. v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS

    110 Phil 443

  • G.R. No. L-14623 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. YAKANS ASPALIN

    110 Phil 454

  • G.R. No. L-14858 December 29, 1960 - MARIANO S. GONZAGA v. AUGUSTO CE DAVID

    110 Phil 460

  • G.R. No. L-14985 December 29, 1960 - FRANCISCO U. BUENASEDA v. BOWEN & CO., INC.

    110 Phil 464

  • G.R. No. L-15100 December 29, 1960 - IN RE: VICENTE TIU NAVARRO v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

    110 Phil 468

  • G.R. No. L-15118 December 29, 1960 - ERLANGER & GALINGER, INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    110 Phil 470

  • G.R. No. L-15140 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN DEROSARIO

    110 Phil 476

  • G.R. No. L-15154 December 29, 1960 - GIL VILLANUEVA v. FILOMENO GIRGED

    110 Phil 478

  • G.R. No. L-15155 December 29, 1960 - BOARD OF LIQUIDATORS v. EXEQUIEL FLORO

    110 Phil 482

  • G.R. Nos. L-15167-68 December 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSALIO PANCHO

    110 Phil 490

  • G.R. No. L-15182 December 29, 1960 - SANTIAGA BLANCO v. FRUCTUOSA ESQUIERDO

    110 Phil 494

  • G.R. No. L-15193 December 29, 1960 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ

    110 Phil 499

  • G.R. No. L-15595 December 29, 1960 - MARTIN CAÑADA v. CANDIDO RUBI

    110 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. L-15654 December 29, 1960 - DELGADO BROTHERS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    110 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. L-15753 December 29, 1960 - JUANA REYES VDA. DE AREJOLA v. CAMARINES SUR REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL SCHOOL

    110 Phil 517

  • G.R. No. L-15800 December 29, 1960 - C. K. VASWANI v. P. TARACHAND BROS.

    110 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. L-15813 December 29, 1960 - GERMAN DE ORTUBE v. JUSTINIANO T. ASUNCION

    110 Phil 529

  • G.R. No. L-15978 December 29, 1960 - DAVAO GULF LUMBER CORP. v. N. BAENS DEL ROSARIO

    110 Phil 532

  • G.R. No. L-16153 December 29, 1960 - ESTRELLA E. SERRANO v. ANDRES REYES

    110 Phil 536

  • G.R. No. L-16285 December 29, 1960 - JOSE SETON v. JOSE S. RODRIGUEZ

    110 Phil 548

  • G.R. No. L-17512 December 29, 1960 - CLARO IBASCO v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO

    110 Phil 553

  • G.R. Nos. L-13012 & L-14876 December 31, 1960 - CITY OF CEBU v. EDMUNDO S. PICCIO

    110 Phil 558

  • G.R. Nos. L-13983-85 December 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PERLITO SOYANG

    110 Phil 565

  • G.R. No. L-14921 December 31, 1960 - DOLORES B. GUICO v. PABLO G. BAUTISTA

    110 Phil 584

  • G.R. Nos. L-15024-25 December 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE SACAYANAN

    110 Phil 588

  • G.R. No. L-15560 December 31, 1960 - INTERNATIONAL OIL FACTORY WORKERS UNION v. ARSENIO MARTINEZ

    110 Phil 595

  • G.R. No. L-16035 December 31, 1960 - THERESE VILLANUEVA v. PANTALEON A. PELAYO

    110 Phil 602

  • G.R. No. L-16521 December 31, 1960 - PORFIRIO DIAZ v. EMIGDIO NIETES

    110 Phil 606