Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1961 > April 1961 Decisions > G.R. No. L-14756 April 26, 1961 - EMILIANO BALADJAY v. ZOILO CASTRILLO, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-14756. April 26, 1961.]

EMILIANO BALADJAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HON. ZOILO CASTRILLO, in his capacity as Director of Lands and MARIA BALCITA, Defendants-Appellees.

Valeriano S. Kaamiño, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Solicitor General for defendant-appellee Director of Lands.

Antonio J. Dalangpan for defendant-appellee Maria Balcita.


SYLLABUS


1. HOMESTEAD PATENTS; DOCTRINE OF EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AND AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SEEK CANCELLATION OF TITLE; APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE LANDS OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN WHICH HAVE BEEN GRANTED BY VIRTUE OF PATENTS. — The doctrine requiring that the administrative remedies be first exhausted before recourse to the courts of justice may be had and the legal provision giving the Government the exclusive authority to seek cancellation of a title issued in conformity with a homestead patent and reversion of land to the public domain are, in the very nature of things, confined in their application to lands of the public domain which have been granted by virtue of such patent in pursuance of the Public Land Act. They are inapplicable to private lands, not even to those acquired by the Government by purchase for resale to individuals (Marukot v. Jacinto, 98 Phil., 128; 52 Off. Gaz., Santiago v. Cruz, 98 Phil., 168; Geukeko v. Araneta; 102 Phil., 706; 54 Off. Gaz., [15] 4494).


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


Appeal from an order of the Court of First Instance of Misamis Occidental dismissing the present case without special pronouncement as to costs.

Plaintiff Emiliano Baladjay instituted this case, against the Director of Lands and Maria Balcita, on June 3, 1958. Baladjay alleged in the complaint that he is the owner in fee simple of a parcel of land situated in the barrio of Capucao, City of Ozamiz, otherwise known as Lot No. 2170, Case No. 17 of Ozamiz Cadastre, and more particularly described in said pleading, he, as well as his predecessors in interest, having been, for time immemorial in public, open, peaceful, uninterrupted and continuous possession of said lot as owners thereof and having exercised full dominion, possession and control thereof and introduced permanent improvements thereon, as well as paid regularly the corresponding real estate taxes; that he had just learned that the Director of Lands had, on April 30, 1958, issued, in favor of Maria Balcita, Free Patent No. V-94223 covering said lot; that the registration of said patent and the issuance of the owner’s duplicate certificate of title in accordance with section 122 of Act No. 496 is pending in the office of Register of Deeds of Oroquieta, Misamis Oriental; that, apparently, the Director of Lands had issued said free patent by virtue of an application of Maria Balcita, without an investigation to determine the truth of the allegations therein made, without ascertaining whether Maria Balcita came within the provisions of the pertinent law and without giving the notice required by the same to afford adverse claimants an opportunity to file their claims; that Maria Balcita had maliciously and in bad faith applied for, and, by fraudulent means and false proofs or concealment obtained, said free patent, for neither she nor her predecessors in interests had ever occupied or cultivated said Lot No. 2170 or paid real estate taxes thereon; that neither had she claimed said lot in said cadastral proceedings; and that, owing to her wrongful acts, plaintiff had suffered moral and actual damages in the sum of P5,000 and was constrained to engage the services of counsel at a cost of P1,000. Plaintiff prayed, therefore, that the aforementioned free patent be declared null and void, as well as rescinded and cancelled, and that Maria Balcita be sentenced to pay him damages and attorney’s fees, as well as the costs.

The Director of Lands filed an answer admitting the issuance of said free patent to Maria Balcita, denying most of the other allegations in the complaint, and averred that Maria Balcita had inherited Lot No. 2170 from her parents, who had held it since 1914; that upon the filing of her free patent application, an investigation was made by a representative of the Bureau of Lands, who found her in the actual occupation and cultivation of said lot; that copies of the notice of said application were duly posted for the period and at the places required by law; and that plaintiff Baladjay is not the owner of said lot and has no legal right thereto. By way of affirmative defense, the Director of Lands alleged that the court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint; that plaintiff has not exhausted, or even availed, of the administrative remedies in the executive branch of the government; and that he had no personality to institute this action. Said officer further alleged, by way of special defense, that the lot in question is a public land, subject to his exclusive jurisdiction; that the aforementioned free patent was duly processed and issued after verifying that Maria Balcita had complied with all pertinent requirements; and that plaintiff had never protested against her free patent application, while it was being processed in the Bureau of Lands, despite the notice aforementioned. .

Maria Balcita, in turn, moved for the dismissal of the complaint, upon the ground: (1) that the court had no jurisdiction over its subject matter, for plaintiff had neither exhausted the administrative remedies nor even filed a protest with the Bureau of Lands; and (2) that he has no legal capacity to sue, for a certificate of title issued in consequence of a patent granted by the Government, once registered in the corresponding Register of Deeds, becomes operative under the Land Registration Act, and may be cancelled at the instance only of the Government, upon failure of the grantee to comply with the conditions imposed by law.

The lower court granted this motion to dismiss. Hence, the appeal by plaintiff Baladjay.

The appeal is well taken. The doctrine requiring that administrative remedies be first exhausted before a recourse to the courts of justice may be had and the legal provision giving the Government the exclusive authority to seek cancellation of a title issued in conformity with a homestead patent and reversion of a land to the public domain are, in the very nature of things, confined in their application to lands of the public domain which have been granted by virtue of such patent in pursuance of the Public Lands Act. They are inapplicable to private lands, not even to those acquired by the Government by purchase for resale to individuals (Marukot v. Jacinto, L-8036-8038, December 20, 1955; Santiago v. Cruz, L-8271-8272, December 29, 1955; Geukeko v. Araneta, L-10182, December 24, 1957).

The defendants herein claim, it is true, that Lot No. 2170 is part of the public domain. A motion to dismiss the complaint assumes, however, that its allegations are true, and plaintiff alleges in her complaint that said lot is her private property. In other words, the complaint does not indicate that plaintiff had derived his title from the Government or that said lot ever been under the jurisdiction or management of the Director of Lands. Upon the allegations of fact made in said pleading, plaintiff was not bound, therefore, to resort to the administrative remedies provided in the Public Lands Act as a condition precedent to a judicial recourse for the protection of his alleged rights. Whether plaintiff is capable of proving the truth of said allegations is another thing. But this is a matter that will have to be determined after he has had an opportunity to introduce evidence thereon. It can not be taken upon motion to dismiss.

WHEREFORE, the order appealed from is hereby reversed and set aside, and the record of this case should be, as it is hereby, remanded to the lower court for further proceedings, with the costs of this instance against defendant Maria Balcita. It is so ordered.

Bengzon, Actg. C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J.B.L., Paredes and Dizon, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1961 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 439 April 12, 1961 - LEDESMA DE JESUS-PARAS v. QUINCIANO VAILOCES

  • G.R. No. L-14158 April 12, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14324 April 12, 1961 - IN RE: WILLIAM LI YAO v. NARCISA B. DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15705 April 15, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. DY CHAY

  • G.R. No. L-15861 April 15, 1961 - LIM GIOK v. BATAAN CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-13325 April 20, 1961 - SANTIAGO GANCAYCO v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-15102 April 20, 1961 - ALFREDO GARCHITORENA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15950 April 20, 1961 - GERVACIO DAUZ v. FELIPE ELEOSIDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16235 April 20, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS MAGDALUYO

  • G.R. No. L-16473 April 20, 1961 - FELISA QUIJANO v. JACINTO TAMETA

  • G.R. No. L-16739 April 20, 1961 - VICENTE PENUELA, ET AL. v. ERNESTO HORNADA

  • G.R. No. L-16777 April 20, 1961 - QUINTIN CHAN v. JUAN B. ESPE

  • G.R. No. L-14711 April 22, 1961 - SMITH, BELL & CO., LTD. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE & MANILA RAILROAD CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-10367 April 25, 1961 - MARY MCD. BACHRACH v. PHILIPPINE TRUST CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12602 April 25, 1961 - LUIS PINEDA v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF DAVAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12918 April 25, 1961 - SANTIAGO BALMONTE v. JULIAN MARCELO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15123 April 25, 1961 - GENERAL SHIPPING CO., INC. v. SATURNINO C. PINOON

  • G.R. No. L-15957 April 25, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN ESPIRITU

  • G.R. No. L-16051 April 25, 1961 - FERNANDO GOCHOCO, ET AL. v. CHANG HIOK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16733 April 25, 1961 - MANUELA MENDOZA ET AL. v. KAPISANAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA MANILA RAILROAD CO.

  • G.R. No. L-17046 April 25, 1961 - JUAN ADUAN, ET AL. v. PANTALEON ALBA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11406 April 26, 1961 - MARIANO J. SANTOS v. ALEJANDRO DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. L-12822 April 26, 1961 - LIM BUN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-12836 April 26, 1961 - MANILA TRADING AND SUPPLY CO. v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13143 April 26, 1961 - DEMETRIO CARPENA, ET AL. v. LUCIANO MANALO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14756 April 26, 1961 - EMILIANO BALADJAY v. ZOILO CASTRILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15381 and 82 April 26, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIA MAYDIN

  • G.R. No. L-15410 April 26, 1961 - MANUEL M. ANTONIO v. MAURO SAMONTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15415 April 26, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO ABACITE, ET AL. .

  • G.R. No. L-15700 April 26, 1961 - CRESENCIA VDA. DE BAKIT v. VERONICO ASPERIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15872 April 26, 1961 - CITY OF MANILA v. ANTONIA EBAY

  • G.R. No. L-16234 April 26, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANITO FETALVERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16596 April 26, 1961 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY OF DAGUPAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16659 April 26, 1961 - ALFREDO REYES v. JOSE PASCUAL

  • G.R. No. L-16878 April 26, 1961 - JUAN SANCHEZ v. OSCAR DEL ROSARIO

  • G.R. No. L-16963 April 26, 1961 - ROXAS Y CIA v. JOSE R. CABATUANDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12236 April 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BRAULIO BERSALONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14793 April 28, 1961 - PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENT CHURCH v. JUANA MATEO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15065 April 28, 1961 - CESAR D. MILITAR v. VENTURA TORCILLERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15139 April 28, 1961 - FELIX DE CASTRO, JR., ET AL. v. EMITERIO M. CASTAÑEDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15877 April 28, 1961 - JOVENAL R. FERNANDEZ v. TAN TIONG TICK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15952 April 28, 1961 - SYBIL SAMSON, ET AL. v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-16355-56 April 28, 1961 - IGNACIO GONZALES v. JOSE M. SANTOS, ET. AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16560 April 28, 1961 - TOMAS BENAZA, ET AL. v. ZOILO BONILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10763 April 29, 1961 - DELFIN YAMBAO v. ANGELINA GONZALES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11084 April 29, 1961 - ALEJANDRO QUEMUEL, ET AL. v. ANGEL S. OLAES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11499 April 29, 1961 - IN RE: REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. GO BON LEE

  • G.R. No. L-11639 April 29, 1961 - DANIEL DE LEON v. JOAQUIN HENSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11765 April 29, 1961 - DAMASO DESCUTIDO, ET AL. v. JACINTO BALTAZAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12888 April 29, 1961 - R. F. NAVARRO v. SUGAR PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-13252 April 29, 1961 - CONSUELO TAN VDA. DE ZALDARRIAGA v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13515 April 29, 1961 - PAZ BACABAC v. VICENTE F. DELFIN, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13976 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNARDO Z. OBALDO

  • G.R. No. L-13994 April 29, 1961 - VALERIO P. TRIA v. WENCESLAO A. LIRAG

  • G.R. No. L-14146 April 29, 1961 - NG LIAM KENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-14220 April 29, 1961 - DOMINGO E. LEONOR v. FRANCISCO SYCIP

  • G.R. No. L-14421 April 29, 1961 - GUAGUA ELECTRIC LIGHT PLANT COMPANY, INC. v. COLLE CTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14603 April 29, 1961 - RICARDO LACERNA, ET AL. v. AGATONA PAURILLO VDA. DE CORCINO

  • G.R. No. L-14712 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO CORTES

  • G.R. No. L-14783 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIAL P. AMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14871 April 29, 1961 - FLORENCIA M. GUANCO v. SEGUNDO MONTEBLANCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14969 April 29, 1961 - LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION v. CEFERINO ASCUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15014 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICTORIANO VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-15171 April 29, 1961 - LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15225 April 29, 1961 - C. G. NAZARIO & SONS, INC. v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15347 April 29, 1961 - GENERAL BUS CORPORATION, ET AL. v. GREGORIO CUNANAN

  • G.R. No. L-15386 April 29, 1961 - JOSE L. UY v. PACITA UY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15394 April 29, 1961 - CESARIO DE LEON, ET AL. v. MACAPANTON ABBAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15445 April 29, 1961 - IN RE: FLORANTE C. TIMBOL v. JOSE C. CANO

  • G.R. Nos. L-15490-93 April 29, 1961 - CAMARINES SUR INDUSTRY CORPORATION v. JAIME T. BUENAFLOR

  • G.R. No. L-15506 April 29, 1961 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15515 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGER M. PERETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15564 April 29, 1961 - PASCUAL STA. ANA v. EULALIO MENLA

  • G.R. No. L-15739 April 29, 1961 - EMILIANO LACSON, SR. v. JACINTO DELGADO

  • G.R. No. L-15768 April 29, 1961 - TALIM QUARRY COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. GAVINO BARTOLA BERNARDO ABELLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15775 April 29, 1961 - TAN YU CHIN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15960 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN REGINALDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15973 April 29, 1961 - PERPETUA GARGOLLO v. ALFREDO DUERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16071 April 29, 1961 - RUFINO O. ABUDA v. AUDITOR GENERAL

  • G.R. No. L-16137 April 29, 1961 - VIRGINIA AMOR, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-16138 April 29, 1961 - DIOSDADO C. TY v. FIRST NATIONAL SURETY & ASSURANCE CO, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-16221 April 29, 1961 - RODOLFO GERONIMO v. MUNICIPALlTY OF CABA, LA UNION

  • G.R. No. L-16422 April 29, 1961 - JUSTINA C. SANTOS, ET AL. v. NATIVIDAD ALMEDA LOPEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16448 April 29, 1961 - REGISTER OF DEEDS OF QUEZON CITY v. HONESTO G. NICANDRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16509 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16535 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PANTALEON ELPEDES

  • G.R. No. L-17015 April 29, 1961 - GEORGE H. EVANS, ETC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17114 April 29, 1961 - JULIA M. NEIBERT v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

  • G.R. No. L-17202 April 29, 1961 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC. v. COTO LABOR UNION (NLU), ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17377 April 29, 1961 - FRANCISCO LAGUNILLA v. JUAN O. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18359 April 29, 1961 - CALIXTO DUQUE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MANILA, ET AL.