Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1961 > April 1961 Decisions > G.R. No. L-15394 April 29, 1961 - CESARIO DE LEON, ET AL. v. MACAPANTON ABBAS, ET AL. :




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-15394. April 29, 1961.]

CESARIO DE LEON, as Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, PABLO SARAGINA, and FILOMENA TAMBIS, Petitioners, v. THE HON. JUDGE MACAPANTON ABBAS of the Court of First Instance of Davao, and AGUSTIN PAHAMOTANG, Respondents.

Paciano C. Villavieja and Meliton C. Parducho, for Petitioners.

Hermogenes R. Rigor and Alfredo C. Benedicto for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. PARTIES; REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST; WHEN WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER A NOMINAL PARTY. — Parties in whose favor the award sought to be annulled has been made are not nominal parties and real parties, but the principal parties and real parties in interest, without whom no decision on the validity of the award can legally be rendered. The nominal party is the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, who made the award and who is jointly sued with the other parties.

2. appeal and error; appeal bond; government not required to file bond. — Where the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner is sued in his official capacity, the action is in effect one against the Government which is not required to file an appeal bond.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


This is a petition for a writ of certiorari and mandamus to set aside certain orders of respondent, Hon. Macapanton Abbas, as Judge of First Instance of Davao, and to compel him to allow petitioners Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis, as defendants in Civil Case No. 2586 of said court, to appeal as paupers, to permit petitioner Cesareo de Leon as Workmen’s Compensatlon Commissioner, likewise, as defendant in said case, to perfect his appeal from the decision therein rendered, without filing an appeal bond, and to certify the record on appeal filed in connection with said appeal.

Petitioners Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis are the parents of Jacinto Saragina, driver of a truck belonging to Agustin Pahamotang and used by the latter in logging operations. On March 6, 1954, Jacinto Saragina died in consequences of injuries sustained by him as said truck fell into a ditch and turned turtle, somewhere in Campostela, Davao, on said date. By a communication dated November 21, 1955, the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner advised Pahamotang that the sum of P1,996.80 was due to the parents of the deceased by way of compensation for his death, aside from P200 as burial expenses. A reconsideration of this award having been denied, Pahamotang gave notice of appeal and then filed with this Court, on December 11, 1956, a petition for certiorari with preliminary injunction, which was docketed as G.R. No. L-11657, for a review of said award. The petition was dismissed, however, on March 8, 1957, on motion of the respondents therein (petitioners herein), who claimed that said petition had been filed beyond the statutory period.

One year later, or on March 1, 1958, Pahamotang instituted Civil Case No. 2586 of the Court of First Instance of Davao against petitioners herein. In the complaint therein filed, Pahamotang alleged that the aforementioned award of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission had been made without complying with the pertinent law and in violation thereof, and, accordingly, prayed that it be set aside and declared null and void. In due course, the defendants therein (petitioners herein) filed a motion to dismiss, the consideration of which was eventually deferred until after the trial of the case on the merits. Subsequently, the defendants therein (petitioners herein) were declared in default, for failure to file an answer within the reglementary period, and, upon the evidence introduced by Pahamotang, decision was rendered on August 7, 1958, annulling the aforementioned award. On August 20, 1958, the defendants therein (petitioners herein) filed a motion to lift the order of default, upon the ground of accident and excusable negligence, but, the motion was denied by an order dated September 9, 1958. A reconsideration of this order having been, likewise, denied, the defendants therein (petitioners herein) filed a notice of their intention to appeal and petition that the appeal of Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis be given due course as pauper’s appeal. The court, presided over by Hon. Macapanton Abbas, Judge, "denied" the "notice of appeal and petition to appeal as pauper" upon the ground that it had not been "filed within the reglementary period." On motion of the defendants therein (petitioners herein), the court, by an order dated January 2, 1959, reconsidered its stand insofar as the timeliness of the notice of appeal, but refused to allow Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis to appeal as paupers, upon the ground that the principal defendant was the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, and declared that the record on appeal would be certified upon the filing of defendants’ appeal bond. The defendants therein (petitioners herein) sought a reconsideration of this order, insofar as it denied the appeal as paupers of Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis and required the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner to file a bond, but in vain. Hence the present action for certiorari and mandamus to compel allowance of the appeal of Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis as paupers, and certification of the aforementioned record on appeal without any appeal bond.

It is not disputed that Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis are poor. This notwithstanding, the lower court refused to allow them to appeal as paupers upon the ground that they are nominal defendants in said Civil Case No. 2586, that the principal defendant therein is the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, with whom they are jointly sued, and that all defendants have filed a joint record on appeal and are represented by the legal counsel of the Department of Labor. If Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis, whose indigency is admitted, were merely nominal parties, then this would be an added reason to exempt them from incurring the usual expenses entailed by an appeal, and, hence, to authorize their appeal as paupers. The fact is, however, that being the parties in whose favor the award sought to be annulled has been made, Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis are not nominal parties, but the principal parties and real parties in interest, without whom no decision on the validity of said award could legally be rendered. The nominal party was the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner.

With respect to the appeal taken by the latter, it is, also, patent that he being sued in his official capacity, aside from being a nominal party, the main action is in effect one against the Government which is not required to file an appeal bond. Accordingly, respondent Judge committed a grave abuse of discretion in requiring the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner to file such bond as a condition for the perfection of his appeal and the certification of the record on appeal.

There being now no question that the same has been seasonably filed and is regular insofar as its form and contents are concerned, the writs prayed for are hereby granted and respondent Judge is directed to allow the appeal of Pablo Saragina and Filomena Tambis as paupers and to certify said record on appeal without the usual appeal bond, with costs against respondent Agustin Pahamotang. .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Bengzon, C.J., Labrador, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes and Dizon, JJ., concur.

Padilla, J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1961 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 439 April 12, 1961 - LEDESMA DE JESUS-PARAS v. QUINCIANO VAILOCES

  • G.R. No. L-14158 April 12, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14324 April 12, 1961 - IN RE: WILLIAM LI YAO v. NARCISA B. DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15705 April 15, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. DY CHAY

  • G.R. No. L-15861 April 15, 1961 - LIM GIOK v. BATAAN CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-13325 April 20, 1961 - SANTIAGO GANCAYCO v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-15102 April 20, 1961 - ALFREDO GARCHITORENA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15950 April 20, 1961 - GERVACIO DAUZ v. FELIPE ELEOSIDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16235 April 20, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS MAGDALUYO

  • G.R. No. L-16473 April 20, 1961 - FELISA QUIJANO v. JACINTO TAMETA

  • G.R. No. L-16739 April 20, 1961 - VICENTE PENUELA, ET AL. v. ERNESTO HORNADA

  • G.R. No. L-16777 April 20, 1961 - QUINTIN CHAN v. JUAN B. ESPE

  • G.R. No. L-14711 April 22, 1961 - SMITH, BELL & CO., LTD. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE & MANILA RAILROAD CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-10367 April 25, 1961 - MARY MCD. BACHRACH v. PHILIPPINE TRUST CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12602 April 25, 1961 - LUIS PINEDA v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF DAVAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12918 April 25, 1961 - SANTIAGO BALMONTE v. JULIAN MARCELO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15123 April 25, 1961 - GENERAL SHIPPING CO., INC. v. SATURNINO C. PINOON

  • G.R. No. L-15957 April 25, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN ESPIRITU

  • G.R. No. L-16051 April 25, 1961 - FERNANDO GOCHOCO, ET AL. v. CHANG HIOK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16733 April 25, 1961 - MANUELA MENDOZA ET AL. v. KAPISANAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA MANILA RAILROAD CO.

  • G.R. No. L-17046 April 25, 1961 - JUAN ADUAN, ET AL. v. PANTALEON ALBA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11406 April 26, 1961 - MARIANO J. SANTOS v. ALEJANDRO DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. L-12822 April 26, 1961 - LIM BUN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-12836 April 26, 1961 - MANILA TRADING AND SUPPLY CO. v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13143 April 26, 1961 - DEMETRIO CARPENA, ET AL. v. LUCIANO MANALO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14756 April 26, 1961 - EMILIANO BALADJAY v. ZOILO CASTRILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15381 and 82 April 26, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIA MAYDIN

  • G.R. No. L-15410 April 26, 1961 - MANUEL M. ANTONIO v. MAURO SAMONTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15415 April 26, 1961 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO ABACITE, ET AL. .

  • G.R. No. L-15700 April 26, 1961 - CRESENCIA VDA. DE BAKIT v. VERONICO ASPERIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15872 April 26, 1961 - CITY OF MANILA v. ANTONIA EBAY

  • G.R. No. L-16234 April 26, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANITO FETALVERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16596 April 26, 1961 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY OF DAGUPAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16659 April 26, 1961 - ALFREDO REYES v. JOSE PASCUAL

  • G.R. No. L-16878 April 26, 1961 - JUAN SANCHEZ v. OSCAR DEL ROSARIO

  • G.R. No. L-16963 April 26, 1961 - ROXAS Y CIA v. JOSE R. CABATUANDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12236 April 28, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BRAULIO BERSALONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14793 April 28, 1961 - PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENT CHURCH v. JUANA MATEO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15065 April 28, 1961 - CESAR D. MILITAR v. VENTURA TORCILLERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15139 April 28, 1961 - FELIX DE CASTRO, JR., ET AL. v. EMITERIO M. CASTAÑEDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15877 April 28, 1961 - JOVENAL R. FERNANDEZ v. TAN TIONG TICK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15952 April 28, 1961 - SYBIL SAMSON, ET AL. v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-16355-56 April 28, 1961 - IGNACIO GONZALES v. JOSE M. SANTOS, ET. AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16560 April 28, 1961 - TOMAS BENAZA, ET AL. v. ZOILO BONILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-10763 April 29, 1961 - DELFIN YAMBAO v. ANGELINA GONZALES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11084 April 29, 1961 - ALEJANDRO QUEMUEL, ET AL. v. ANGEL S. OLAES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11499 April 29, 1961 - IN RE: REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. GO BON LEE

  • G.R. No. L-11639 April 29, 1961 - DANIEL DE LEON v. JOAQUIN HENSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11765 April 29, 1961 - DAMASO DESCUTIDO, ET AL. v. JACINTO BALTAZAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12888 April 29, 1961 - R. F. NAVARRO v. SUGAR PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-13252 April 29, 1961 - CONSUELO TAN VDA. DE ZALDARRIAGA v. EDUARDO D. ENRIQUEZ ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13515 April 29, 1961 - PAZ BACABAC v. VICENTE F. DELFIN, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13976 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNARDO Z. OBALDO

  • G.R. No. L-13994 April 29, 1961 - VALERIO P. TRIA v. WENCESLAO A. LIRAG

  • G.R. No. L-14146 April 29, 1961 - NG LIAM KENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-14220 April 29, 1961 - DOMINGO E. LEONOR v. FRANCISCO SYCIP

  • G.R. No. L-14421 April 29, 1961 - GUAGUA ELECTRIC LIGHT PLANT COMPANY, INC. v. COLLE CTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14603 April 29, 1961 - RICARDO LACERNA, ET AL. v. AGATONA PAURILLO VDA. DE CORCINO

  • G.R. No. L-14712 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO CORTES

  • G.R. No. L-14783 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIAL P. AMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14871 April 29, 1961 - FLORENCIA M. GUANCO v. SEGUNDO MONTEBLANCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14969 April 29, 1961 - LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION v. CEFERINO ASCUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15014 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICTORIANO VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. L-15171 April 29, 1961 - LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15225 April 29, 1961 - C. G. NAZARIO & SONS, INC. v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15347 April 29, 1961 - GENERAL BUS CORPORATION, ET AL. v. GREGORIO CUNANAN

  • G.R. No. L-15386 April 29, 1961 - JOSE L. UY v. PACITA UY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15394 April 29, 1961 - CESARIO DE LEON, ET AL. v. MACAPANTON ABBAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15445 April 29, 1961 - IN RE: FLORANTE C. TIMBOL v. JOSE C. CANO

  • G.R. Nos. L-15490-93 April 29, 1961 - CAMARINES SUR INDUSTRY CORPORATION v. JAIME T. BUENAFLOR

  • G.R. No. L-15506 April 29, 1961 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15515 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGER M. PERETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15564 April 29, 1961 - PASCUAL STA. ANA v. EULALIO MENLA

  • G.R. No. L-15739 April 29, 1961 - EMILIANO LACSON, SR. v. JACINTO DELGADO

  • G.R. No. L-15768 April 29, 1961 - TALIM QUARRY COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. GAVINO BARTOLA BERNARDO ABELLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15775 April 29, 1961 - TAN YU CHIN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15960 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN REGINALDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15973 April 29, 1961 - PERPETUA GARGOLLO v. ALFREDO DUERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16071 April 29, 1961 - RUFINO O. ABUDA v. AUDITOR GENERAL

  • G.R. No. L-16137 April 29, 1961 - VIRGINIA AMOR, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-16138 April 29, 1961 - DIOSDADO C. TY v. FIRST NATIONAL SURETY & ASSURANCE CO, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-16221 April 29, 1961 - RODOLFO GERONIMO v. MUNICIPALlTY OF CABA, LA UNION

  • G.R. No. L-16422 April 29, 1961 - JUSTINA C. SANTOS, ET AL. v. NATIVIDAD ALMEDA LOPEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16448 April 29, 1961 - REGISTER OF DEEDS OF QUEZON CITY v. HONESTO G. NICANDRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16509 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16535 April 29, 1961 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PANTALEON ELPEDES

  • G.R. No. L-17015 April 29, 1961 - GEORGE H. EVANS, ETC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17114 April 29, 1961 - JULIA M. NEIBERT v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

  • G.R. No. L-17202 April 29, 1961 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC. v. COTO LABOR UNION (NLU), ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17377 April 29, 1961 - FRANCISCO LAGUNILLA v. JUAN O. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18359 April 29, 1961 - CALIXTO DUQUE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MANILA, ET AL.