Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > January 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-22215 January 30, 1968 - GONZALO PUYAT & SONS, INC. v. PEDRO LABAYO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-22215. January 30, 1968.]

GONZALO PUYAT & SONS, INC., Petitioner, v. PEDRO LABAYO, HON. JUDGES OF THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOSE S. BAUTISTA, ARSENIO I. MARTINEZ, BALTAZAR M. VILLANUEVA, EMILIANO C. TABIGNE, and AMANDO C. BUGAYONG, Respondents.

Ponce Enrile, Siguion Reyna, Montecillo & Belo for Petitioner.

Balguma & Olandesca for respondent Pedro Labayo.

Mariano B. Tuason for respondent Judges of the Court of Industrial Relations.


SYLLABUS


1. COURTS; JURISDICTION; JURISDICTION OF THE CIR UPHELD OVER CLAIMS FOR OVERTIME PAY, REINSTATEMENT, AND OTHER DEMANDS. — The Court of Industrial Relations has jurisdiction over a claim for overtime pay for work performed on regular days and Sundays arising from the Eight- Hour Labor Law when claimant seeks reinstatement or reestablishment of employer-employee relationship. Along with overtime pay claim, the CIR has also authority to act over the laborer’s other demands as back wages and separation pay, for with the reinstatement prayer, they all arise out of or are in connection with his employment.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; `SPLIT’ JURISDICTION, FROWNED UPON. — The laborer need not seek separate relief for back wages and separation pay from a regular court of justice; a piecemeal resort to one court and another gives rise to multiplicity of suits. Orderly administration of justice dictates that all causes of action be cognizable and heard by only one court.


D E C I S I O N


SANCHEZ, J.:


Sole issue is the jurisdiction of the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) over a claim for —

1. Reinstatement, with back wages for unjustified dismissal, or, in the alternative, separation pay; and

2. Compensation for overtime work performed on regular days and Sundays.

This jurisdictional problem has its roots in the following: On May 16, 1963, Pedro Labayo lodged in CIR a complaint against petitioner Gonzalo Puyat & Sons, Inc. 1 Labayo there averred that since 1938, he had been a foreman in petitioner’s furniture manufacturing business, until March 19, 1963 when he was not allowed, without just cause, to work further. He characterized his dismissal as illegal — "without the benefit of a previous notice nor the payment of the equivalent separation pay." He prayed for reinstatement with back wages incident thereto, or, in the alternative, separation pay; unpaid overtime services for "not less than two to three hours a day for two working days in a month" during his entire period of employment; unpaid Sunday work for "not less than two Sundays in a month’s time," also during his entire period of employment; and attorneys’ fees.

Petitioner met Labayo’s complaint with a motion to dismiss. Ground: Lack of jurisdiction. On August 1, 1963. CIR Judge Baltazar M. Villanueva denied the motion. Reconsideration was rejected by CIR’s en banc resolution of November 19, 1963. The matter was then elevated by petitioner to this Court on certiorari and prohibition.

This question is not new. By well-entrenched jurisprudence, CIR has jurisdiction over a claim for overtime pay for work performed on regular days and Sundays — which arises under the Eight-Hour Labor Law — when claimant seeks reinstatement or the re-establishment of employer-employee relationship. 2 The recitals of the complaint herein come under this precept. CIR is with jurisdiction.

Along with the overtime pay claim, CIR, too, has authority to act over the laborer’s other demands, namely, for back wages due to unjustified dismissal and separation pay. For, with the reinstatement prayer, they all arise out of, or are in connection with, his employment. 3 Accordingly, said laborer need not seek separate relief — for back wages and separation pay — from a regular court of justice. We have declared that: 4" [t]o draw a tenuous jurisdictional line is to undermine stability in labor litigations. A piecemeal resort to one court and another gives rise to multiplicity of suits. To force the employees to shuttle from one court to another to secure full redress is a situation gravely prejudicial. The time to be lost, effort wasted, anxiety augmented, additional expense incurred — these are considerations which weigh heavily against split jurisdiction."cralaw virtua1aw library

Thus, did we say, as we do here, that it is more in keeping with the orderly administration of justice that all causes of action herein be cognizable and heard by only one court: the Court of Industrial Relations. 5

We find no argument potent enough to make us depart from the views heretofore expressed. We hold that CIR has jurisdiction over the complaint here under consideration.

For the reasons given, the petition herein for certiorari and prohibition is hereby dismissed.

Costs against petitioner. So ordered.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L,, Dizon, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Ruiz Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. CIR Case No. 1827-V entitled "Pedro Labayo, Petitioner, v. Gonzalo Puyat & Sons, Inc., Respondent."cralaw virtua1aw library

2. Campos v. Manila Railroad Co., L-17905, May 25, 1962; National Shipyards and Steel Corporation v. Court of Industrial Relations, L- 21675, May 23, 1967. See also: Philippine Engineers’ Syndicate, Inc. v. Bautista, L-16440, February 29, 1964; Moncada Bijon Factory v. Court of Industrial Relations, L-16037, April 29, 1964; Serrano v. Serrano, L-19562, May 23, 1964; Mercado v. Elizalde & Company, L- 13962, December 23, 1964; Red V Coconut Products, Ltd. v. Court of Industrial Relations, L-21348, June 30, 1966.

3. PRISCO v. CIR, L-13806, May 23, 1960.

4. Bay View Hotel, Inc. v. Manila Hotel Workers’ Union-PTGWO, L- 21803, December 17, 1966; Rheem of the Philippines, Inc. v. Ferrer, L-22979, January 27, 1967.

5. Bay View Hotel, Inc. v. Manila Hotel Workers’ Union-PTGWO, supra, citing Gomez, v. North Camarines Lumber Co., Inc., L-11945, August 18, 1958; Rheem of the Philippines, Inc. v. Ferrer, supra.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-23542 January 2, 1968 - JUANA T. VDA. DE RACHO v. MUNICIPALITY OF ILAGAN

  • G.R. No. L-23988 January 7, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LEONARDO S. VILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24922 January 2, 1968 - MELECIO DOREGO, ET AL. v. ARISTON PEREZ

  • G.R. No. L-24108 January 3, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24190 January 8, 1968 - RAFAEL FALCOTELO, ET AL. v. RESTITUTO GALI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24432 January 12, 1968 - NAZARIO EQUIZABAL v. APOLONIO G. MALENIZA

  • G.R. No. L-22294 January 12, 1968 - DIONISIA PARAMI VDA. DE CABASAG v. AMADOR P. SU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22991 January 16, 1968 - BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-23293 January 16, 1968 - LUIS R. AYO, JR. v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24480 January 16, 1968 - LUCRECIO DE GUZMAN, ET AL. v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-22794 January 16, 1968 - RUFO QUEMUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22018 January 17, 1968 - APOLONIO GALOFA v. NEE BON SING

  • G.R. No. L-22081 January 17, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTOS M. CABANERO

  • G.R. No. L-22605 January 17, 1968 - CEBU PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-23690 January 17, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

  • G.R. No. L-24230 January 17, 1968 - EUGENIA TORNILLA v. TEODORICA FUENTESPINA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24434 January 17, 1968 - PEDRO REGANON, ET AL. v. RUFINO IMPERIAL

  • G.R. No. L-28459 January 17, 1968 - RAFAEL FALCOTELO, ET AL. v. MACARIO ASISTIO

  • G.R. No. L-22518 January 17, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO ATENCIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23707 January 17, 1968 - JOSE A.V. CORPUS v. FEDERICO C. ALIKPALA

  • G.R. No. L-26103 January 17, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELMER ESTRADA

  • G.R. No. L-19255 January 18, 1968 - PHILIPPINE AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. AUDITOR GENERAL

  • G.R. No. L-24707 January 18, 1968 - JOSE S. CAPISTRANO v. JUAN BOGAR

  • G.R. No. L-24946 January 18, 1968 - MARTINIANO P. VIVO v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-23116 January 24, 1968 - IN RE: ANTONIO JAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24287 January 24, 1968 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION COMPANY, INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-22985 January 24, 1968 - BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. GREGORIO CAGUIMBAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-18546 & L-18547 January 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PRUDENCIO OPINIANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19752 January 29, 1968 - LAND SETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. AGUSTIN CARLOS

  • G.R. No. L-23555 January 29, 1968 - FLOREÑA TINAGAN v. VALERIO V. ROVIRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22468 January 29, 1968 - PUAHAY LAO v. DIMTOY SUAREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24607 January 29, 1968 - TOMAS TRIA TIRONA v. CITY TREASURER OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-24795 January 29, 1968 - PEDRO JIMENEA v. ROMEO G. GUANZON, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20449 January 29, 1968 - ESPERANZA FABIAN, ET AL. v. SILBINA FABIAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28415 January 29, 1968 - ESTRELLO T. ONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23012 January 29, 1968 - MIGUEL CUENCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23052 January 29, 1968 - CITY OF MANILA v. GENERO M. TEOTICO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28518 January 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORENZO G. PADERNA

  • G.R. No. L-18971 January 29, 1968 - IN RE: ABUNDIO ROTAQUIO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21718 January 29, 1968 - MILAGROS F. VDA. DE FORTEZA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28392 January 29, 1968 - JOSE C. AQUINO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27268 January 29, 1968 - JUANITA JUAN-MARCELO, ET AL. v. GO KIM PAH, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22145 January 30, 1968 - A. M. RAYMUNDO & CO. v. BENITO SYMACO

  • G.R. No. L-22686 January 30, 1968 - BERNARDO JOCSON, ET AL. v. REDENCION GLORIOSO

  • G.R. No. L-24073 January 30, 1968 - PAMPANGA SUGAR MILLS v. REGINA GALANG VDA. DE ESPELETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27583 January 30, 1968 - MARGARITO J. LOFRANCO v. JESUS JIMENEZ, SR.

  • G.R. No. L-19565 January 30, 1968 - ESTRELLA DE LA CRUZ v. SEVERINO DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-20316 January 30, 1968 - LEONCIA CABRERA DE CHUATOCO v. GREGORIO ARAGON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21855 January 30, 1968 - IN RE: ANDRES SINGSON v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22973 January 30, 1968 - MAMBULAO LUMBER COMPANY v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22215 January 30, 1968 - GONZALO PUYAT & SONS, INC. v. PEDRO LABAYO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23702 January 30, 1968 - MARIA VILLAFLOR v. ARTURO REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23965 January 30, 1968 - FLOREÑA TINAGAN v. JOSE PERLAS, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-21423 January 31, 1968 - GO KIONG OCHURA, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23424 January 31, 1968 - LOURDES ARCUINO, ET AL. v. RUFINA APARIS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22968 January 31, 1968 - BENEDICTO BALUYOT, ET AL. v. EULOGIO E. VENEGAS

  • G.R. No. L-24859 January 31, 1968 - PABLO R. AQUINO v. GENERAL MANAGER OF THE GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-25083 January 31, 1968 - JUSTINO QUETULIO, ET AL. v. NENA Q. DE LA CUESTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20387 January 31, 1968 - JESUS P. MORFE v. AMELITO R. MUTUC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23170 January 31, 1968 - ALBINA DE LOS SANTOS v. ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23279 January 31, 1968 - ALEJANDRA CUARTO v. ESTELITA DE LUNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23980 January 31, 1968 - JULIA SAN BUENAVENTURA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25472 January 31, 1968 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. ANGELA PURUGANAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24528 January 31, 1968 - DOMINGO T. LAO v. JOSE MOYA

  • G.R. No. L-22061 January 31, 1968 - DALMACIO URTULA, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-27776 January 31, 1968 - AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANILA PORT SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-28476 January 31, 1968 - ALEJANDRO REYES v. ANATALIO REYES, ET AL.