Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1982 > May 1982 Decisions > G.R. No. L-55698 May 31, 1982 - ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

199 Phil. 517:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-55698. May 31, 1982.]

ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, LABOR ARBITER RICARTE T. SORIANO and RODITO SIASICO, Respondents.

Sycip, Salazar, Feliciano & Hernandez for Petitioner.

Raul E. Espinosa for Private Respondents.


D E C I S I O N


AQUINO, J.:


Engineering Equipment, Inc. in its petition for certiorari assailed the decision of Labor Arbiter Ricarte T. Soriano dated January 10, 1979, requiring it to pay Rodito Siasico an amount corresponding to what he should have earned under his overseas assignment agreement. That decision was affirmed by the National Labor Relations Commission in its resolution dated October 6, 1980.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

The petition was given due course. The case was submitted for decision on August 12, 1981. On April 15, 1982, the parties submitted the following compromise agreement and prayed that it be approved and the case dismissed:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

"KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"This Compromise Agreement made and executed by and between —

RODITO SIASICO, Filipino, of legal age, and presently residing at Vicmico, Victorias, Negros Occidental, hereinafter referred to as the COMPLAINANT;

— and —

ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT, INC., with business address at 110 E. Rodriguez Jr. Avenue, Ortigas Industrial Estate, Quezon City, represented in this act by ROMEO L. CABRERA, hereinafter referred to as the COMPANY.chanrobles law library

WITNESSETH: That

"WHEREAS, COMPLAINANT and the COMPANY are parties to Case No. G. R. 55698, entitled ‘Engineering Equipment, Inc. v. NLRC, Et. Al.’ now pending before the Supreme Court;

"WHEREAS, the parties herein realizing the greater advantages of an earlier resolution of their differences have decided not to pursue further the aforementioned case;

"NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and of the mutual covenants and stipulations hereinafter set forth, both parties herein have mutually agreed and by these presents, do hereby agree and confirm their agreement as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. The COMPANY hereby grants to COMPLAINANT the total sum of TWELVE THOUSAND PESOS (P12,000.00), Philippine currency, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by COMPLAINANT.

"2. The payment by the COMPANY and the receipt/acceptance by COMPLAINANT of said amount constitute final and complete settlement of any and all claims COMPLAINANT has or may have against the COMPANY, its stockholders, officers, directors, agents or employees by virtue of his employment with the COMPANY, whether arising from law, contract or company policy and COMPLAINANT acknowledges that he has no cause of action, complaint, case or grievance whatsoever against the COMPANY, its stockholders, officers, directors, agents or employees in respect of any matter incident to or arising out of his previous employment with the COMPANY and/or the cessation of that employment. COMPLAINANT further warrants that he will institute no action and will not continue to prosecute pending actions, including but not limited to the above-mentioned case pending resolution with the Supreme Court, against the COMPANY, its stockholders, officers, directors, agents or employees.

"3. COMPLAINANT hereby manifest that the grant by the COMPANY of the above-mentioned amount to COMPLAINANT shall not be construed by him, or his representative, as a confession or an admission of liability on the part of the COMPANY, its officers, stockholders or representatives, on any matter, cause demand or damages he now or may have against any or all of them.

"4. As a result of this settlement, the parties herein mutually release and discharge one another from any and all claims or causes of action incident to or arising from the above-mentioned case, it being clearly understood that the mutual covenants herein constitute the full, final and complete settlement of all claims/demand/causes of action between the parties herein.

"5. By this Agreement, which is free from fraud, misrepresentation or coercion, COMPLAINANT and the COMPANY are hereby withdrawing the aforementioned case now pending with the Supreme Court, docketed as Case No. G. R. 55698 which should be dismissed with prejudice and deemed finally closed and terminated for all intents and purposes.

"IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their signatures this 2nd day of April 1982, in Makati, Metro Manila.

(Sgd.) Rodito Siasico

"RODITO SIASICO ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT, INC.

Complainant Company

By:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(Sgd.) Romeo L. Cabrera

ROMEO L. CABRERA.

"Assisted by: Assisted by:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(Sgd.) Raul E. Espinosa SYCIP, SALAZAR, FELICIANO

"Atty. RAUL E. ESPINOSA & HERNANDEZ

By:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(Sgd.) J.H. Cacanindin

JUSTINO H. CACANINDIN"

(Notarial acknowledgment is omitted)

The said compromise agreement is hereby approved. This case is dismissed and considered closed and terminated. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Barredo (Chairman), Guerrero, Abad Santos, De Castro and Escolin, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, Jr., J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman





May-1982 Jurisprudence                 

  • Adm. Matter No. 2668-MJ May 22, 1982 - MARIANO B. LAUREL v. HERMENEGILDO C. CRUZ

    4199 Phil. 243

  • G.R. No. L-28245 May 22, 1982 - PHILIPPINE AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 245

  • G.R. No. L-29555 May 22, 1982 - ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. REPARATIONS COMMISSION

    199 Phil. 256

  • G.R. No. L-29917 May 22, 1982 - FOREMOST ENTERPRISES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 264

  • G.R. Nos. L-48376-85 May 22, 1982 - BALAGTAS REALTY CORPORATION v. MANUEL V. ROMILLO, JR., ET AL.

    199 Phil. 267

  • G.R. No. L-54887 May 22, 1982 - GUILLERMA FLORDELIS, ET AL. v. FERMIN MAR, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 281

  • G.R. No. L-57535 May 24, 1982 - ZENITH INSURANCE CORPORATION v. FIDEL P. PURISIMA, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 291

  • Adm. Case No. 133-J May 31, 1982 - BERNARDITA R. MACARIOLA v. ELIAS B. ASUNCION

    199 Phil. 295

  • Adm. Case No. 797 May 31, 1982 - LYDIA CABATU v. EDGARDO C. DOMINGO

    199 Phil. 324

  • Adm. Matter No. 2180-MJ May 31, 1982 - EPHRAIM MARIANO, ET AL. v. CRISOSTOMO GONZALES

    199 Phil. 326

  • Adm. Matter No. 2240-MJ May 31, 1982 - COSME S. ABIOG, ET AL. v. JOSE M. PASCUAL

  • G.R. No. L-25271 May 31, 1982 - REPARATIONS COMMISSION v. GUILLERMO SANTOS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 339

  • G.R. No. L-30028 May 31, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CRESENCIO DOBLE, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 343

  • G.R. No. 31255 May 31, 1982 - MARCIAL A. EDILLON v. PIO B. FERANDOS

    199 Phil. 363

  • G.R. No. L-32734 May 31, 1982 - IN RE: CHUA TIONG KANG, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    199 Phil. 366

  • G.R. No. L-33209 May 31, 1982 - JESUSA DEL ROSARIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 367

  • G.R. No. L-33794 May 31, 1982 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 381

  • G.R. No. L-35105 May 31, 1982 - BALIUAG ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, INC. v. JUAN F. ECHIVERI

    199 Phil. 393

  • G.R. No. L-35136 May 31, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMADO MONSALUD

    199 Phil. 398

  • G.R. No. L-36754 May 31, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNALDO ABAYON, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 404

  • G.R. No. L-37074 May 31, 1982 - IN RE: BENITO LEE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    199 Phil. 436

  • G.R. No. L-37243 May 31, 1982 - IN RE: ALFONSO P. BICHARA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    199 Phil. 438

  • G.R. No. L-37477 May 31, 1982 - TORIBIO LESCANO v. JUAN A. BAES, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 440

  • G.R. No. L-39172 May 31, 1982 - SAMUEL DUMLAO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 442

  • G.R. No. L-40101 May 31, 1982 - FABIAN BORLAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 448

  • G.R. No. L-46245 May 31, 1982 - MERALCO SECURITIES INDUSTRIAL CORP. v. CENTRAL BRD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 453

  • G.R. No. L-47334 May 31, 1982 - MIGUEL VIOLAGO, ET AL. v. JOSE C. CAMPOS, JR., ET AL.

    199 Phil. 463

  • G.R. No. L-47943 May 31, 1982 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 465

  • G.R. No. L-50081 May 31, 1982 - SANTOS CODILLA v. FLORENCIA LOPEZ, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 471

  • G.R. No. L-50261 May 31, 1982 - IN RE: CECILIA LAVIDES, ET AL. v. CITY COURT OF LUCENA

    199 Phil. 478

  • G.R. No. L-50466 May 31, 1982 - CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 487

  • G.R. No. L-52038 May 31, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CRISPIN ROYO, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 493

  • G.R. No. L-52516 May 31, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NILO TALORONG

    199 Phil. 502

  • G.R. No. L-53672 May 31, 1982 - BATA INDUSTRIES, LTD. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 506

  • G.R. No. L-54681 May 31, 1982 - LILIA B. BARRERA v. FRANCIS J. MILITANTE, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 511

  • G.R. No. L-55698 May 31, 1982 - ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 517

  • G.R. No. L-55831 May 31, 1982 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GILBERT MEDRANO, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 520

  • G.R. No. L-57771 May 31, 1982 - QUIRINO CAVILI, ET AL. v. CIPRIANO VAMENTA, JR., ET AL.

    199 Phil. 528

  • G.R. No. L-58681 May 31, 1982 - ALFREDO P. MALIT v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    199 Phil. 532

  • G.R. No. L-59743 May 31, 1982 - NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUGAR WORKERS v. ETHELWOLDO R. OVEJERA, ET AL.

    199 Phil. 537