Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1951 > May 1951 Decisions > G.R. No. L-2841 May 28, 1951 - PINDAÑGAN AGRICULTURAL Co. v. LUDOVICO ESTRADA

089 Phil 80:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-2841. May 28, 1951.]

PINDAÑGAN AGRICULTURAL Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUDOVICO ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellee.

Primicias, Abad, Mencias & Castillo for Appellant.

Cecilio I. Lim and Antonio S. Atienza for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. COURTS; DISCRETIONARY POWER; MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED OUT OF TIME, ADMITTED. — Under section 16, Rule 15 of the Rules of Court, the court has discretion to permit an answer or other pleadings to be presented even after the time fixed for its presentation; and the defendant may, within the time of pleading, file a motion to dismiss (section 1 of Rule 8).

2. OBLIGATIONS; MORATORIUM LAW; REPUBLIC ACT No. 342 NOT RETROACTIVE. — Republic Act No. 342, approved July 29, 1948, lifting the moratorium in so far as it affected prewar obligations except when the debtor had a claim for damage duly filed with the United States Philippine War Damage Commission, has no retroactive effect and therefore is not applicable to a case where the plaintiff’s complaint was filed in 1947, notwithstanding that, at the time of its enactment said case had not yet been finally dismissed for the reason that there was then pending a motion for reconsideration of an order of dismissal dated February 12, 1948.


D E C I S I O N


FERIA, J.:


On December 11, 1947, plaintiff-appellant filed in the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan a complaint against defendant-appellee to recover from the latter the sum of P958.02 with legal interest from and after the filing of the complaint and until the full amount is paid. Of said amount, P576.02 was in arrear in the payment of rents or canons of certain parcels of land leased by the appellant to the appellee for the agricultural years 1937 to the year 1945, and the sum of P382 for the agricultural years from 1945 to the time of the filing of the complaint.

The defendant, eighteen days after he was duly summoned to answer, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground "that the claim on which the action or suit is based, is unenforceable by virtue of the provisions of Executive Order No. 25 as amended by Executive Order No. 32, known as Debt Moratorium Proclamation." The court admitted the motion over the objection of the plaintiff, and on February 12, 1948, dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that the plaintiff’s action is covered by the Moratorium.

Plaintiff appealed from the order of dismissal of the lower court and assigned three (3) errors:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

The first which assigns that the lower court erred in admitting the motion to dismiss and not declaring the defendant in default is without merit, because under section 16, Rule 15 of the Rules of Court, the court has discretion to permit an answer or other writings to be presented even after the time fixed for its presentation; and the defendant may, within the time of pleading, file a motion to dismiss (section 1 of Rule 8).

The appellant’s second assignment is that the lower court erred in holding that all the obligations covered by the present action are covered by the Debt Moratorium, inasmuch as the obligation to pay the canons due after liberation for the agricultural years of 1945-6, 1946-7 and 1947-8, which amount to P382 is not covered by said Executive Orders No. 25 and 32. The appellee agrees with the appellant and asks this court to remand this case to the court of origin and the defendant allowed to answer the complaint as to that claim.

The third error assigned is that the lower court likewise erred in not granting appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the order of the court a quo, filed on November 16, 1948, on the ground that "the Debt Moratorium has already been lifted by virtue of the enactment of Republic Act No. 342 on July 29, 1948." The appellant, in support of this assignment, contends that "the provisions of said Republic Act No. 342 has lifted the moratorium in so far as it affected prewar obligations except when the debtor had a claim for war damage duly filed with the United States Philippine War Damage Commission" ; and inasmuch as at the time of the enactment of said Republic Act on July 29, 1948, the present case had not yet been finally dismissed for the reason that there was then pending a motion for reconsideration of the order of dismissal dated February 12, 1948, said act is applicable.

The appellee on the other hand, argues that said Republic Act No. 342 has no retroactive effect, and therefore is not applicable to this case, for the plaintiff’s complaint was filed on December 11, 1947, and "if the appellant insists that said Act is applicable because it overtook the action in the lower court, appellee would also maintain that said court lost its jurisdiction because of the passage of Act No. 296, otherwise known as Judiciary Act, approved on June 16, 1948," which conferred upon justice of the peace and municipal courts exclusive jurisdiction over civil cases involving an amount not exceeding P2,000; but appellee says "he does not invoke the Judiciary because it is equally untenable." Appellee asks for the dismissal of the case as to the claim of P572.02 without prejudice to appellant’s filing a new complaint as regards said amount in the proper courts.

We are of the opinion, and so hold, that the appellee’s contention is correct. Therefore, the order appealed from, in so far as it dismisses the complaint for recovery of the rent or canon for the agricultural years from 1945 to 1948 is reversed, and the case is remanded to the court of origin for further action; and the order dismissing the complaint as to the appellant’s claim of P572.02, for canons or rents of the land leased to the appellee for the agricultural years from 1937 to 1945, is affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new complaint in the proper court against the appellee. So ordered.

Paras, C.J., Pablo, Bengzon, Tuason, Montemayor, Jugo and Bautista Angelo, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1951 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-4638 May 8, 1951 - TOMAS L. CABILI, ET AL. v. VICENTE FRANCISCO, ET AL.

    088 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. L-2926 May 11, 1951 - PAZ JARIN, ET AL. v. DANIEL SARINAS, ET AL.

    088 Phil 660

  • G.R. No. L-3254 May 11, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUGENIO NATE, ET AL.

    088 Phil 663

  • G.R. No. L-2260 May 14, 1951 - HONORATO DE VERA v. JOSE C. FERNANDEZ

    088 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. L-2843 May 14, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. BENITO GUHITING, ET AL.

    088 Phil 672

  • G.R. Nos. L-3112 & L-3113 May 14, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. SEVERINO NOLASCO

    088 Phil 676

  • G.R. No. L-2236 May 16, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BLAS CRUZ

    088 Phil 684

  • G.R. No. L-3047 May 16, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUADALUPE ZAPATA, ET AL.

    088 Phil 688

  • G.R. Nos. L-3248 & L-3249 May 16, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORENZO AGUILAR

    088 Phil 693

  • G.R. No. L-3321 May 16, 1951 - FORTUNATO F. HALILI v. PAZ E. DE LA CRUZ

    088 Phil 699

  • G.R. No. L-3824 May 16, 1951 - BENJAMIN v. HON. MARIANO C. MELENDRES

    088 Phil 703

  • G.R. No. L-2464 May 18, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO AGUILA

    088 Phil 711

  • G.R. No. L-2755 May 18, 1951 - JOHNNY CHAUSINTEK v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    088 Phil 717

  • G.R. No. L-3345 May 18, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS S. TAPANG

    088 Phil 721

  • G.R. Nos. L-3386 & L-3387 May 18, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO IBALI

    088 Phil 724

  • G.R. No. L-3497 May 18, 1951 - VALENTINA CUEVAS v. PILAR ACHACOSO

    088 Phil 730

  • G.R. No. L-3987 May 18, 1951 - JOHNLO TRADING COMPANY v. JOSE P. FLORES, ET AL.

    088 Phil 741

  • G.R. No. L-4459 May 18, 1951 - JOHNLO TRADING COMPANY v. JOSE C. ZULUETA

    088 Phil 750

  • G.R. No. L-2311 May 21, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN NADURATA

    088 Phil 754

  • G.R. No. L-2525 May 21, 1951 - MARY BURKE DESBARATS, ET AL. v. TOMAS DE VERA

    088 Phil 762

  • G.R. No. L-3099 May 21, 1951 - CIPRIANA GONZALES v. PURIFICACION, ET AL.

    088 Phil 770

  • G.R. No. L-3325 May 21, 1951 - FELIX BARRACA v. SOCORRO ZAYCO

    088 Phil 774

  • G.R. No. L-3537 May 21, 1951 - SISENANDO ARGUIETA, ET AL. v. VICENTE CORCUERA, ET AL.

    088 Phil 777

  • G.R. No. L-2155 May 23, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAKADATO ALAMADA

    089 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. L-1687 May 23, 1951 - CIPRIANO KING v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    089 Phil 4

  • G.R. No. L-2834 May 23, 1951 - ENCARNACION CAPARAS v. NICASIO YATCO

    089 Phil 10

  • G.R. No. L-2956 May 23, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELEUTERIO ICARO

    089 Phil 12

  • G.R. No. L-2998 May 23, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOAQUIN FLAVIER

    089 Phil 15

  • G.R. No. L-3002 May 23, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANICETO MARTIN

    089 Phil 18

  • G.R. No. L-3324 May 23, 1951 - QUINCIANO ISAAC v. TACHUAN LEONG

    089 Phil 24

  • G.R. No. L-3430 May 23, 1951 - PAZ E. SIGUION v. GO TECSON

    089 Phil 28

  • G.R. No. L-3495 May 23, 1951 - ISIDORE FALEK v. NATIVIDAD GANDIONGCO DE SINGSON

    089 Phil 33

  • G.R. No. L-3549 May 23, 1951 - BERNARDO P. TIMBOL v. MARIA KABAKAW

    089 Phil 36

  • G.R. No. L-3561 May 23, 1951 - CESAR REYES v. AGRIPINO ZABALLERO

    089 Phil 39

  • G.R. No. L-3621 May 23, 1951 - DOMINGO T. DIKIT v. RAMON A. YCASIANO

    089 Phil 44

  • G.R. No. L-3694 May 23, 1951 - LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY CO. v. POTENCIANO PECSON

    089 Phil 50

  • G.R. No. L-2294 May 25, 1951 - FILIPINAS COMPAÑIA DE SEGUROS v. CHRISTERN

    089 Phil 54

  • G.R. No. L-1594 May 28, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. HONORIO CABILING

    089 Phil 60

  • G.R. No. L-1967 May 28, 1951 - MATILDE MENCIANO v. PAZ NERI SAN JOSE

    089 Phil 63

  • G.R. No. L-2645 May 28, 1951 - IN RE: ALFONSO R. LIM SO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    089 Phil 74

  • G.R. No. L-2695 May 28, 1951 - FERMIN TABANDA v. COURT OF APPEALS

    089 Phil 76

  • G.R. No. L-2841 May 28, 1951 - PINDAÑGAN AGRICULTURAL Co. v. LUDOVICO ESTRADA

    089 Phil 80

  • G.R. No. L-2847 May 28, 1951 - MAXIMINO VALDEZ v. MAGDALENA MENDOZA

    089 Phil 83

  • G.R. No. L-2959 May 28, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELO ALMAZORA

    089 Phil 87

  • G.R. Nos. L-3267 & L-3268 May 28, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE SABADO

    089 Phil 92

  • G.R. No. L-3339 May 28, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. CRISPIN RODILLAS

    089 Phil 99

  • G.R. No. L-3490 May 28, 1951 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. FILEMON CARLON

    089 Phil 105

  • G.R. Nos. L-4053-55 May 28, 1951 - LA PAZ ICE PLANT & COLD STORAGE CO. v. COMISION DE UTILIDADES PUBLICAS

    089 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. L-4143 May 28, 1951 - SIXTO PAÑGILINAN v. EMILIO PEÑA

    089 Phil 122

  • G.R. No. L-1743 May 29, 1951 - DOMINADOR NICOLAS v. VICENTA MATIAS

    089 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. L-1162 May 30, 1951 - IN RE: ROSARIO DIA v. JUAN ZUÑIGA

    089 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. L-1364 May 30, 1951 - LOO SOO and VY LIONG LEE v. DONATO OSORIO

    089 Phil 135

  • G.R. No. L-1866 May 30, 1951 - QUIRINO RANJO v. LEONITA PAYOMO

    089 Phil 138

  • G.R. No. L-2100 May 30, 1951 - GERARDO VASQUEZ v. PATROCINIO GARCIA

    089 Phil 152

  • G.R. No. L-2263 May 30, 1951 - PAZ Y. OCAMPO v. CONRADO POTENCIANO

    089 Phil 159

  • G.R. No. L-2474 May 30, 1951 - MARIANO ANDAL v. EDUVIGIS MACARAIG

    089 Phil 165

  • G.R. No. L-2552 May 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIO DIWA

    089 Phil 170

  • G.R. No. L-2586 May 30, 1951 - ANITA TOMACRUZ v. BEATRIZ B. VALERO

    089 Phil 177

  • G.R. No. L-2664 May 30, 1951 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. GAN TAN

    089 Phil 184

  • G.R. No. L-2715 May 30, 1951 - TERESA ALBERTO v. CASIMIRO MANANGHALA

    089 Phil 188

  • G.R. No. L-2819 May 30, 1951 - MARCIANA ESCOTO v. BENITO M. ARCILLA

    089 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. L-2872 May 30, 1951 - MELECIO ARCEO v. ANDRES VARELA

    089 Phil 212

  • G.R. No. L-3004 May 30, 1951 - BENITA TOMIAS v. CONRADO TOMIAS

    089 Phil 216

  • G.R. No. L-3411 May 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ENGRACIO ARLATINCO

    089 Phil 220

  • G.R. Nos. L-3491-93 May 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO HAMIANA

    089 Phil 225

  • G.R. No. L-3510 May 30, 1951 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANIEL MAGNAYE

    089 Phil 233

  • G.R. No. L-4179 May 30, 1951 - CRISANTO DE BORJA v. DEMETRIO B. ENCARNACION

    089 Phil 239

  • G.R. No. L-4663 May 30, 1951 - FERDINAND E. MARCOS v. CHIEF OF STAFF

    089 Phil 246

  • G.R. No. L-4670 May 30, 1951 - NICANOR MARONILLA-SEVA v. LORENZO B. ANDRADA

    089 Phil 252