ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™  
Main Index Law Library Philippine Laws, Statutes & Codes Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Jurisprudence
Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan's The Labor Code of the Philippines, Annotated Labor Standards & Social Legislation Volume I of a 3-Volume Series 2019 Edition (3rd Revised Edition)
 

 
Chan Robles Virtual Law Library
 









 

 
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

 
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

   
December-1949 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-2502 December 1, 1949 - PROVINCIAL FISCAL OF ILOCOS NORTE v. CEFERINO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL

    085 Phil 77

  • G.R. No. L-2836 December 6, 1949 - ENGRACIA G. DE PONCE v. ALICIA VASQUEZ SAGARIO, ET AL

    085 Phil 79

  • G.R. No. L-2466 December 7, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO TUAZON

    085 Phil 85

  • G.R. No. L-2580 December 7, 1949 - PABLO RICOHERMOSO v. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ, ET AL

    085 Phil 88

  • G.R. No. L-2593 December 7, 1949 - FELIX AZOTES v. MANUEL BLANCO, ET AL

    085 Phil 90

  • G.R. No. L-2652 December 7, 1949 - JULIA LORENZO, ET AL v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF NAIC, ET AL

    085 Phil 92

  • G.R. No. L-2758 December 7, 1949 - CLARO J. GIL, ET AL v. F. IMPERIAL REYES, ET AL

    085 Phil 97

  • G.R. No. L-3452 December 7, 1949 - NACIONALISTA PARTY v. FELIX ANGELO BAUTISTA

    085 Phil 101

  • G.R. No. L-3474 December 7, 1949 - NACIONALISTA PARTY v. VICENTE DE VERA

    085 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. L-2354 December 13, 1949 - ALFONSO ARANETA v. MARTA CUI VDA. DE SANSON

    085 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. L-2672 December 13, 1949 - UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO, ET AL

    085 Phil 144

  • G.R. No. L-3521 December 13, 1949 - NACIONALISTA PARTY ET AL. v. COMELEC

    085 Phil 149

  • G.R. No. L-2722 December 15, 1949 - NICOLAS LIZARES & CO. v. BIENVENIDO TAN

    085 Phil 159

  • G.R. No. L-2802 December 23, 1949 - ROSA PASCUAL, ET AL v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN, ET AL

    085 Phil 164

  • G.R. No. L-2936 December 23, 1949 - TIDE WATER ASSOCIATED OIL CO. v. VICTORY EMPLOYEES, ET AL

    085 Phil 166

  • G.R. No. L-867 December 29, 1949 - ANTONIO DEL ROSARIO ET AL. v. CARLOS SANDICO ET AL.

    085 Phil 170

  • G.R. No. L-1349 December 29, 1949 - H. D. KNEEDLER v. SIMON PATERNO

    085 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. L-1773 December 29, 1949 - ALEJANDRO ANDRES, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    085 Phil 192

  • G.R. No. L-1811 December 29, 1949 - GREGORIO BALVERAN, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS

    085 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. L-1877 December 29, 1949 - H. P. HOSKYNS v. NAT’L. CITY BANK OF NEW YORK

    085 Phil 201

  • G.R. No. L-1965 December 29, 1949 - EDUARDO OSORIO v. MARINA OSORIO

    085 Phil 209

  • G.R. No. L-2020 December 29, 1949 - LA ORDEN DE PADRES BENEDICTINOS DE FILIPINAS v. PHIL. TRUST CO.

    085 Phil 217

  • G.R. No. L-2360 December 29, 1949 - GAVINO ALDAMIZ v. JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MINDORO, ET AL

    085 Phil 228

  • G.R. No. L-2404 December 29, 1949 - FABIAN B. S. ABELLERA v. FELICIANO GARCIA

    085 Phil 237

  • G.R. No. L-2634 December 29, 1949 - PACIFIC IMPORTING & EXPORTING CO. v. CATALINO TINIO, ET AL

    085 Phil 239

  • G.R. No. L-2570 December 29, 1949 - BACHRACH MOTOR CO. v. RURAL TRANSIT EMPLOYEES’ ASSO.

    085 Phil 242

  • G.R. No. L-2678 December 29, 1949 - ANTONIO C. ARAGON v. MARCOS JORGE

    085 Phil 246

  • G.R. No. L-2717 December 29, 1949 - IRINEO FACUNDO v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN ET AL.

    085 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. L-2752 December 29, 1949 - URBANO OLAVARIO ET AL. v. JUAN T. VILLANUEVA

    085 Phil 254

  • G.R. No. L-2842 December 29, 1949 - JOSE T. VALMONTE, ET AL v. MARIANO NABLE, ET AL

    085 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. L-2850 December 29, 1949 - ONG KIM PAN, ET AL v. FRANCISCO GERONIMO, ET AL

    085 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. L-2942 December 29, 1949 - SILVESTRA COQUIA, ET AL v. RODOLFO BALTAZAR, ET AL

    085 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-3039 December 29, 1949 - VICTORIO REYNOSO, ET AL v. VICENTE SANTIAGO, ET AL

    085 Phil 268

  • G.R. No. L-3261 December 29, 1949 - HECTOR G. PALILEO v. FRED RUIZ CASTRO, ET AL

    085 Phil 272

  • G.R. No. L-2529 December 31, 1949 - J. A. SISON v. BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, EZT AL

    085 Phil 276

  • G.R. No. L-2720 December 31, 1949 - HEMANDAS UDHARAM v. RAFAEL DINGLASAN

    085 Phil 284

  • G.R. No. L-2893 December 31, 1949 - AGRIPINO JIMINEZ, ET AL v. EUSEBIO F. RAMOS

    085 Phil 286

  •  





     
     

    G.R. No. L-1773   December 29, 1949 - ALEJANDRO ANDRES, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL. <br /><br />085 Phil 192

     
    PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

    EN BANC

    [G.R. No. L-1773. December 29, 1949.]

    ALEJANDRO ANDRES and HERMINIA PICHAY, Petitioners, v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, ROSARIO MATA, FLORENCIO CASTRO, TOMAS CASTRO, Jr., ELMER CASTRO, OLIVER CASTRO, CLARITA CASTRO, and MAYVELIN CASTRO, Respondents.

    Adriano A. Pasion and Matias E. Vergara, for Petitioners.

    Bartolome Guirao, for Respondents.

    SYLLABUS


    1. OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS; PAYMENT MADE DURING OCCUPATION WITH JAPANESE WAR NOTES, VALIDITY OF; LEGAL TENDER. — Payment of debts and obligations during the occupation with the war notes issued by the Japanese occupation forces is valid, and said war notes were then legal tender.

    2. ID.; CONSIGNATION; SUFFICIENCY OF NOTICE BY FILING COMPLAINT WITH COURT. — After the rejection by the creditor of the valid tender made by the debtor, the latter filed the corresponding complaint in court accompanying the filing of the suit with the consignation of the money in court and alleging and mentioning said consignation in the complaint. That step may be considered as sufficient notice to said creditor of the consignation of the amount due.

    3. ID.; ID.; BALLANTYNE SCALE OF VALUES; LOSS OF MONEY CONSIGNED IN COURT DURING OCCUPATION; WHO MAY SUFFER THE LOSS. — When a debtor during the Japanese occupation consigned the money in court and gave the creditor the right and the choice to receive said amount, in such a case the Ballantyne scale of values could not be applied; said debtor had done all that was incumbent upon him to do and the creditor has no one to blame but himself for the consequences now that the Japanese war notes have not only continued to depreciate in value since April, 1944, but have now become worthless.


    D E C I S I O N


    MONTEMAYOR, J.:


    On September 22, 1938, by means of a deed of sale (Exhibit A), Tomas Castro conveyed lot No. 9318, with a t house thereon, situated in the municipality of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, for the sum of P5,500 to Alejandro Andres and Herminia Pichay, with a clause to the effect that the vendor reserved the right to redeem the property by paying back the sales price in not less than four years and not more than six years after the expiration of said period of four years. By April, 1944, Tomas had already died but in that month and year, his widow Rosario Mata offered the sum of P5,500 in Japanese military notes to the vendees for the repurchase of the property, but said vendees rejected the offer or tender of payment on the ground that the value of the money offered was very much less than that of the money which they had paid for the property in 1938. To force repurchase, Rosario brought an action in her name and that of her children had by Tomas Castro against the vendees to compel them to reconvey the property to her and her children at the same time depositing and consigning in court the said sum of P5,500. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Rosario and her children, in the following terms:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "Por todas estas consideraciones, el Juzgado dicto sentencia a favor de los demandantes, ordenando a los demandados Alejandro Andres y Herminia Pichay a devolver el solar que se describe en la escritura de compraventa con pacto de retro (Exh. A) a los demandantes y que otorguen un documento de retroventa a favor de los demandantes, y una vez otorgada dicha escritura de retroventa dichos demandados podran recibir del Tesorero Provincial de Ilocos Norte la suma de P5,500 depositada por los demandantes en poder del Escribano de este Juzgado bajo el recibo oficial No. J-0672621 y depositada a su vez por el Escribano de este Juzgado bajo el recibo oficial No. I-49410 en la Tesoreria Provincial de esta provincia; y al pago de las costas del presente juicio."cralaw virtua1aw library

    Alejandro and Herminia appealed to the Court of Appeals which tribunal affirmed the judgment of the lower court. The defendants-appellants, now petitioners in this case by way of certiorari have asked this Court to review the decision of the Court of Appeals.

    The main issue involved in this case is the legality of the tender of payment. Petitioners claim that the Japanese military notes in 1944 were not legal tender, and that because of their greatly depreciated value, to compel petitioners to accept said notes as the repurchase price, would be a great injustice to them.

    The reason why this appeal by certiorari was given due course by this Court was that at that time, there had not yet been any ruling as regards the legality of payment during the Japanese military occupation of debts and obligations with the said Japanese war notes. However, on April 9, 1948, a decision of this Court in the case of Haw Pia v. China Banking Corporation (45 Off. Gaz., No. 9 Supplement, p. 229), 1 was promulgated wherein it was ruled that payment of debts and obligations with the war notes issued by the Japanese occupation forces was valid.

    There are other cases decided by this Court, based on the Haw Pia case holding that during the Japanese occupation the Japanese war notes were legal tender. (Notor v. Martinez, 2 G. R. No. L-1892, promulgated August 16, 1949, and cases cited there.)

    It is therefore clear that the respondents made a valid tender of the repurchase price of the property in question and consequently, the Court of Appeals committed no error in affirming the judgment of the lower court.

    The petitioners also question the validity and regularity of the consignation in court made by respondents of the sum of P5,500. Suffice it to say on this point that after the rejection by the petitioners of the valid tender made by the respondents, the latter filed the corresponding complaint in court accompanying the filing of the suit with the consignation of the money in court and alleging and mentioning said consignation in the complaint. This was sufficient notice to the petitioners of the consignation so that if they wanted to receive that money from the court in return for a reconveyance of the property in question, they could have done so. Not only this, but the judgment of the lower court directed the herein petitioners, defendants in that case to execute the reconveyance of the lot after which, they could receive the money consigned in court.

    It is also insinuated in the brief of the petitioners that assuming that the Japanese war notes were legal tender, in view of their depreciated value, the amount of P5,500 tendered by the respondents should be evaluated according to the Ballantyne Schedule after which the respondents should be ordered to pay to the petitioners the equivalent of said war notes in genuine Philippine currency. Had the respondents confined themselves to making the offer or tender of the amount of P5,500 without consigning the same in court, the result might have been that said respondents by said tender, retained or preserved their right to repurchase the property but that they might now be required to pay in genuine Philippine currency the equivalent of the amount then tendered. However, inasmuch as they consigned the money in court and gave the petitioners the right and the choice to receive said amount, said respondents had done all that was incumbent upon them to do and the petitioners have no one to blame but themselves for the consequences now that the Japanese war notes have not only continued to depreciate in value since April 1944, but have now become worthless.

    In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Court of Appeals is hereby affirmed. Considering that at the time these certiorari proceedings were initiated there was as yet no ruling by this Court as to the validity of tender of payment with Japanese war notes during the occupation of debts and obligations, and presuming that the petitioners herein have filed this appeal in good faith, we make no pronouncement as to costs.

    Moran, C.J., Ozaeta, Paras, Bengzon, Reyes and Torres, JJ., concur.

    Separate Opinions


    TUASON, J.:


    I concur in the result.

    PABLO, M., disidente:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

    Disiento.

    La clausula de retracto es del tenor siguiente:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "Las condiciones de esta venta son tales que yo el vendedor, mis herederos, sucesores y cesionarios, no podremos redimir esta propiedad durante los primeros cuatro años y si dentro de los otros seis años siguientes devolvieremos la expresada suma de cinco mil quinientos pesos (P5,500) y los otros gastos que durante este periodo de diez años desde el otorgamiento de esta escritura se ocasionaran, los compradores, sus herederos, sucesores y cesionarios nos otorgaran escritura de retroventa pero si trascurre dicho plazo sin haber nosotros utilizado el derecho de redencion adquirira la presente el caracter de absoluta e irrevocablemente consumada, pero en el entretanto solo podran los compradores disponer de la finca conforme a las limitaciones prescritas por la ley. Que del precio de compra corresponde a Herminia Pishay la suma de cuatro mil pesos y al Sr. Alejandro Andres la suma de mil quinientos pesos."cralaw virtua1aw library

    De acuerdo con este convenio, los vendedores deben devolver a cambio del terreno o de la finca cinco mil quinientos pesos (P5,500), moneda filipina, y no cinco mil quinientos pesos en papel moneda japonesa. Cuando los demandantes consignaron en la escribania del juzgado la cantidad de 5,500 de esta clase de moneda, no habian cumplido el termino expreso del convenio. Por tanto, los demandados no estaban obligados a recibir la consignacion; pues, el articulo 1176 del Codigo Civil dice que "si el acreedor a quien se hiciere el ofrecimiento de pago se negare sin razon a admitirlo, el deudor quedara libre de responsabilidad mediante la consignacion de la cosa debida." Y el parrafo segundo del articulo siguiente dice que "La consignacion sera ineficaz si no se ajusta estrictamente a las disposiciones que regulan el pago." El pago, segun el convenio, debe hacerse en moneda filipina.

    Tengase en cuenta que, al tiempo de la consignacion, no habia ninguna orden legal que prohibiese el uso de la moneda filipina. La proclama de 10 de Enero de 1942 del General en jefe de las fuerzas japonesas es del tenor siguiente:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "The currencies which shall be sanctioned by the authorities of the Japanese Army to circulate in the Philippine Islands shall be the peso military notes which are issued by the Imperial Japanese Government, and the Philippine peso currency, which is already in circulation.

    "The circulation of the Yen Paper money (paper money issued by the Japanese Imperial Government, Yen notes issued by the Bank of Japan, Yen notes issued by the Bank of Chosen, Yen notes issued by the Bank of Taiwan, and the military notes other than Peso military notes), piastre currency (notes issued by the Bank of Indo-China), and all other currencies of foreign countries shall be prohibited.

    "However, as for the U. S. dollar currency, the circulation shall be approved at the rate of two pesos (P2) per one dollar ($1), for the time being.

    "Not only the payer of the above-mentioned currencies, which are prohibited to circulate as the means of payment of all transactions, but also the receiver of such currencies shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the martial law.

    "As to the treatment of the possession in the market of the above-mentioned currencies and the U. S. dollar currency which are prohibited to circulate shall be regulated later on.

    "COMMANDER IN CHIEF

    OF THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE FORCES."cralaw virtua1aw library

    No solamente no se prohibio la circulacion legal de la moneda filipina sino que se sanciono su uso. El primer parrafo de la proclama no da lugar a duda alguna. Es clara. Si estaban en curso legal durante la ocupacion japonesa la moneda filipina y la moneda japonesa expedida por el ejercito de ocupacion, entonces los demandados tenian perfectisimo derecho de obligar que los demandantes paguen con moneda filipina legitima, de acuerdo con el convenio de recompra, y no con la moneda japonesa. El hecho de que la moneda japonesa era una de las monedas circulantes o de curso legal entonces, no es razon para que se les obligue a los demandados a recibir la cantidad consignada, pues segun el convenio, la recompra debe hacerse con moneda filipina. Los demandados tenian derecho a exigir el cumplimiento del contrato que es ley entre las partes (Art. 1090, Codigo Civil), tanto mas cuanto que al tiempo del otorgamiento de la escritura de venta ni siquiera paso por la imaginacion de los contratantes que habia de circular alguna vez la moneda japonesa. Lo que se prohibio es la circulacion de los billetes de emergencia del Banco Nacional Filipino expedidos en Visaya y Mindanao segun la proclama de 7 de Mayo de 1942 que dice asi:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "PROCLAMATION BY THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE FORCES CONCERNING PROHIBITION OF CIRCULATION OF PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK EMERGENCY NOTES.

    "Since January, 1942, the Phil-American Army ordered the different branches or agencies of the Philippine National Bank in the Visayan Provinces to issue Philippine National Bank Emergency Circulation Notes for the purpose of using them in the purchase of military supplies and of creating economic confusion and disturbance. For this reason, the circulation of said emergency notes is declared illegal and their acceptance, absolutely prohibited.

    "Inasmuch as these emergency notes were issued for the use of the enemy and considering the nature thereof and the purpose for which they were issued, it is hereby proclaimed that these notes are enemy military notes and consequently, they are declared as having no monetary value whatsoever.

    "COMMANDER IN CHIEF

    OF THE IMPERIAL. JAPANESE FORCES."cralaw virtua1aw library

    El articulo 1170 del Codigo Civil claramente dispone que "el pago de las deudas de dinero debera hacerse en la especie pactada, y, no siendo posible entregar la especie, en la moneda de plata u oro que tenga curso legal." Como no habla prohibicion en el uso de la moneda pactada — moneda filipina — los demandantes debieron haber pagado con dicha moneda y no con la moneda japonesa. Bajo ningun concepto, pues, estaban obligados los demandados a recibir el dinero consignado con que los demandantes querian recomprar la finca. Obligar a los demandados hoy a otorgar escritura de retroventa por papel moneda que no han querido recibir en 1944 y que ya no vale nada, es exigirles a desprenderse por nada de lo que han comprado con P5,500 en legitima moneda filipina. Estaria esta sentencia justificada si los demandados estuviesen legalmente obligados a recibir la consignacion en abril de 1944.

    No Puedo sancionar una injusticia.

    PADILLA, J., concurring:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

    I concur in this dissent. In addition to the reasons given therein, I incorporate herein those advanced by me in G. R. No. L-867, Del Rosario Et. Al., v. Sandico Et. Al., 1 and G. R. No. L-2020, La Orden de Padres Benedictinos de Filipinas v. The Philippine Trust Company. 2

    Endnotes:



    1. 80 Phil., 602.

    2. Off. Gaz., 656.

    1. 85 Phil., 170.

    2. 85 Phil., 217.

    G.R. No. L-1773   December 29, 1949 - ALEJANDRO ANDRES, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL. <br /><br />085 Phil 192


    Back to Home | Back to Main

     

    QUICK SEARCH

    cralaw

       

    cralaw



     
      Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
    ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
     
    RED