April 2007 - Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions > Year 2007 > April 2007 Resolutions >
[G.R. No. 174155 : April 10, 2007] PET ANGELI R. CARLOTO VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.:
[G.R. No. 174155 : April 10, 2007]
PET ANGELI R. CARLOTO VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.
Sirs/Mesdames:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of the Court En Banc dated April 10, 2007
G.R. No. 174155 (Pet Angeli R. Carloto vs. Commission on Elections, et al.)
The Court Resolved to DENY for lack of merit the Motion for Leave of Court to File and Admit Incorporated Second Motion for Reconsideration dated April 2, 2007 filed by counsel for petitioner, considering that a second motion for reconsideration is a prohibited pleading under Rule 52, Section 2 in relation to Rule 56, Section 2, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended.
The Second Motion for Reconsideration incorporated in the aforementioned Motion for Leave is NOTED WITHOUT ACTION in view of the denial of the latter.
The Court further Resolved to DENY for lack of merit the Motion to Suspend the Rules in the Broader Interest of Justice and in View of the Dangerous Implications of the Assailed Decision in the Forthcoming May 14, 2007 Elections, also filed by counsel for petitioner.
In view of the above action on the Second Motion for Reconsideration, the Court likewise Resolved to EXPUNGE from the records the Motion for Oral Argument dated April 4, 2007 filed by counsel for petitioner.
No further pleadings will be entertained.
Let entry of judgment be made in due course."
G.R. No. 174155 (Pet Angeli R. Carloto vs. Commission on Elections, et al.)
The Court Resolved to DENY for lack of merit the Motion for Leave of Court to File and Admit Incorporated Second Motion for Reconsideration dated April 2, 2007 filed by counsel for petitioner, considering that a second motion for reconsideration is a prohibited pleading under Rule 52, Section 2 in relation to Rule 56, Section 2, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended.
The Second Motion for Reconsideration incorporated in the aforementioned Motion for Leave is NOTED WITHOUT ACTION in view of the denial of the latter.
The Court further Resolved to DENY for lack of merit the Motion to Suspend the Rules in the Broader Interest of Justice and in View of the Dangerous Implications of the Assailed Decision in the Forthcoming May 14, 2007 Elections, also filed by counsel for petitioner.
In view of the above action on the Second Motion for Reconsideration, the Court likewise Resolved to EXPUNGE from the records the Motion for Oral Argument dated April 4, 2007 filed by counsel for petitioner.
No further pleadings will be entertained.
Let entry of judgment be made in due course."
Very truly yours,
(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA
Clerk of Court
(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA
Clerk of Court